So basically if you seen Man on Fire, it would be a waste to see The Equalizer?you might already have only it had a bigger budget and was called man on fire
So basically if you seen Man on Fire, it would be a waste to see The Equalizer?you might already have only it had a bigger budget and was called man on fire
hating ass? Judging by the tone of your post you are problem a millennium baby, I've been a fan of Washington longer than your time on earth part of being a fan is admitting the truth. Its okay to often choose similar roles but equalizer was an uninspired and forgettable choice. And you are going to have to accept that
So basically if you seen Man on Fire, it would be a waste to see The Equalizer?
I dont know who you are talking about but if the movie is good, its good.Man, Bob>>>>>>>>>>>>>Creasy
I dont know who you are talking about but if the movie is good, its good.
Im not good with names breh
Denzel in Equalizer, Robert/Bob. Basically I liked this better than Man on fire
Accept shytty opinion
So you are indifferent about the film
what's it called?That movie where he had a time machine or some sh1t. With Val Kilmer. Sh1t was pretty bad
what's it called?
Yeah, I see a lot of movies in the theaters, generally 3-4 a month, so I'm not the type who just won't see it in theaters, I'd watch this in a hotel or something for 20 min before I went to sleep…..The flashy action, cheap sentiment, well worn cliches, I just won't enjoy seeing this, Denzel has done so many of these movies. 'Man On Fire', 'Out Of Time', '2 Guns'…..After that Liam Neeson disaster, I should raise the bar a bit, I doubt this is much better then that, and I thought 'Walk Among In the Tombstones' was garbage.