If you're trying to be a perennial contender, I don't think Brunson/Mitchell gets you there. So you set your price accordingly, which means keeping enough assets to acquire another big piece or to change the roster in case the undersized pairing flops (I picture big backcourts like Boston beating them consistently).
But if you can get Donovan Mitchell...you've gotta at least try. Especially since most of the competition is either:
a) holding less assets
b) focused on other options like Kyrie or KD
c) run by Pat Riley who Danny Ainge hates and would probably love to screw over
But drive a hard bargain and be prepared to hold on until the next available star pops up...it rarely takes long. I'm waiting on SGA rumors and think he'll cost less.
Presti isn’t the best trade partner either but I feel you on SGA. I still think Zach is a real possibility. If he asks out to a destination, can the Bulls do that much better than say, Randle, Fournier and 2 firsts? I think another thing we have going for us is not many teams have the maneuverability cap wise to trade for a star player in-season. It’s gonna be difficult to get to the 32-40 million needed to get a star without giving up a lot of talent needed to contend.
Last edited: