Taadow
The StarchBishop™️
The semantic do not matter because you know I did not literally mean "man sits and waits for childless woman to approach him".
You will not know the life story of every woman you meet until it's told to you or you refuse to date outside of a couple degrees of your social circle which won't work. At some point if you're still single at a certain age you're likely shooting yourself in the foot being early 40s demanding every woman is under 30 or if she's over 30 has to be childless.
As I said to breh if I'm not in a LTR (no marriage) by a certain age I'm not sure a kid on a woman 8-10 years my junior is worth dismissing every other box being checked. Subpar women and great women are subpar or great with or without kids. At my age now I could play that numbers game but eventually it will be almost counterproductive.
Lol, this is exactly why the semantics matter - because I absolutely did not know you didn’t literally mean “man sits and waits for childless woman to approach him”...because as I said, some people actually do that.
You don’t have to “know the life story of every woman” to know whether or not you don’t want to be with her. That is ludicrous as a concept. If I knew how to do it, I would splice this same text into Breh’s thread the other day ago talmbat “would you marry a woman with multiple face tats”.
The fact that you could sum up a woman having children as just “a box to check” is dubious.
That’s a big-ass muthafuccin’ box, my friend!