J.E.T.S
Lookahere mayne...
i dont moderate this sub-forum you dumb fukk.. do your job and stay dapping up these c00ns, pedos & racists..
Stop tryin me bruh.
I see you ain't talking to that nikka like that tho.
i dont moderate this sub-forum you dumb fukk.. do your job and stay dapping up these c00ns, pedos & racists..
So if I get it right, the papers said he did - he said she was raped, he said his cousin was arrested for it, so he went down to the court and said he'll take the responsibility for the alcohol/drugs etc and they pinned the charges on him
She never followed up on her testimony against Char and the charges were dropped to what was proved/admitted by Char
She said he fukked her
He said he didn't
I am confused about the DNA aspect. It says its on record, but I doubt that's a rape kit and Char said the DNA did not match his? Maybe I cannot see some of these images but I'm not seeing much here
yeah....it looks like they had him dead to rights, but she didn't testify. had to get him on the liquor/alcohol piece
Some link?They mainstream is starting to pick this up and are aware of it
It must be a lot of people who haven't lived life. Anyone who's lived life knows a lot of these young adults are not victims by a long shot. All these supposed "I been off the porch" nikkas should know.
You got young nikkas sellin dope and catching bodies at 15.
I know a child when I see one, and I know a young adult when I see one.
You have people who moved out, got apartments, doing everything if not more than 18yo. I left for the Army at 17!
Also, people don't think. What I say is easily observable just by viewing history. People were married and starting families by 15 in history. Like I said, nature will tell you if someone is sexually immature.
We started the age thing due to a society where jobs had age and school requirements. Not for health or moral reasons.
And none of what I say is specifically talking about Char. I just like to make people think of the "why" to certain situations.
What about the DNA aspect though? The report said she went to the station the same night/a day later. There could have been vagina swabs/rape kit used on her to determine whether they had sex
So I am not sure what DNA they have besides pulling his blood to test on god knows what
Not sure it's quiet that simpleNate's girl is white that is why he got heat.
They be having nude and sex scenes in mainstream movies. Remember the Italian wife that got blown up in The Godfather? She was only 15 and she shows her t*ts in the movie.I had an ex, she lost her virginity at 15 to a 26 year old. By 15 she was already hitting the clubs & nikkaz in clubs probably didnt know she was underage
Most females by 15/16 are fukking
Not sure it's quiet that simple
For example Jameis Winston, of FSU, beat the rape charge from the white accuser..in the deep South. Still got drafted into the league.
I see some Black media outlets on Youtube picking it up.Everyone send tips to TMZ. A black woman was raped it’s the least we can do.
Got this from kanyetothe
Charlamagne Tha Rapist Lies:
1. He said that he went to the police station
Arrest Warrant, then documented arrest determined that was a lie:
2. Charlamagne said he wasn't even there and someone framed him. LIE
The victim said he told the courts that the sex was consensual which would explain why even if they found DNA they would need her testimony but since she stopped coming he got a plea deal
3. He lied and said that he was only 20, small lie but still a lie
Now I want to see the DNA results because if he said it was consensual that only means he was forced to admit that he had sex with her.
4. The gang rape story has not been confirmed because she only said HE raped her. That was another lie he made up to discredit her and make it seem like he wasnt involved.
This is the break down of the charges since yall keep trying to say he was never charged or it was dismissed because of DNA. FALSE it would say revaluation of evidence
Break down of the charges and what I FEEL is proof of a Plea deal.
1. Lenard said in the video that he got reduced charges which usually means it was a plea deal.
2. The Charge of THE CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT was disposed of by way of Nolle Pro's one year after he was charged with it.
DNA HAD BEEN IN THE SYSTEM FOR A YEAR 8/28/2001 ALREADY IF IT WAS THE REASON THE CASE WAS DISMISSED THAT WOULDNT TAKE A YEAR.
What's the difference between nolle prosequi and dismissal of charges?
Nolle prosequi is a Latin phrase meaning “will no longer prosecute” NOT THAT HE WAS EXONERATED BECAUSE DNA
A prosecutor might nol pross or dismiss charges for a variety of reasons, including:
The reason given for the Nolle Pro's in the court documents is the one I highlighted. Please pay attention to the dates.
- reevaluation of evidence
- emergence of new evidence
- failure of witnesses to cooperate, or
- desire to give the defendant a second chance.
If we look at the dates of The original charge THE RAPE that was in 8/28/2001
Note: The Grand Jury would not indict him if they didn't have substantial evidence and probable cause
Then on 6/10/2002 A WHOLE YEAR LATER the new charge appears the same day they determine the Victim didnt show up to court.
So it is my belief that they gave him a reduced charge because the case was now weak. They could have still pursued him but why go through the trouble?
Hence the Plea
Note: Lenard LIED and said he only got 2 or 3 months in his video interview. He, in fact, got THREE YEARS
This is looking bad.