FooFighters
Superstar
It's the current year, after all
a woman voice doesn't belong to a woman's now?
"Cyberpunk 2077" (New DLC "Phantom Liberty" | (9/26)
- Thread starter banan
- Start date
-
- Tags
- cyberpunk 2077
Fair, but yet everyone else is giving the game glowing reviews
ok...which is exactly my point and why I don’t get why folks are only discussing the tranny reviews...and lol at me calling them “tranny reviews”
Sounds like if you expecting to go in and experience something mindblowing and new, you're going to be disappointed.
It's seems like it might be a souped up deus ex. Which isn't a bad thing, that game was great.
But I suggest taking off your hype glasses now
It's seems like it might be a souped up deus ex. Which isn't a bad thing, that game was great.
But I suggest taking off your hype glasses now
FreshFromATL
Self Made
These damn bugs/glitche is making me worried. That's the REAL shyt people need to be talking about. shyt might not be playable day 1 
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Ok....so this is what I don’t understand. Y’all (and reviewers) are going crazy over these bugs. I get that, it seems distracting and immersion breaking to a point that you have no choice but to address it. “But Pc gamer giving it a 78/100 because of bugs ... meanwhile they gave AC:Valhalla which is unfinished and filled with bugs even after their latest patch a 92/100.... ok”
Y’all gonna sit here and tell me AC Valhalla a bug ridden game, that is STILL broken to this day and typical ubi-mid is getting a 92/100 out of this publication and cyberpunk is a 78 because of bugs? Someone else help me understand.
Y’all gonna sit here and tell me AC Valhalla a bug ridden game, that is STILL broken to this day and typical ubi-mid is getting a 92/100 out of this publication and cyberpunk is a 78 because of bugs? Someone else help me understand.
Facts. Respect on approaching it with a little nuance.
My general non reading of Polygon aside (if anyone cares, their writing generally skews toward a young, more hipster style crowd that I've noticed takes games maybe a little TOO seriously. Like a bunch of folks that fed themselves a little too much of the "games are art" narrative), when I see interviews like that, I:
Usually catch eye strain from rolling my eyes way too hard at someone trying to take their issues with the game to another level
Take a minute to consider what the talking points actually are, even if it's something I don't necessarily agree or completely identify with
Usually get pissed when they take the route of comparing one minority's struggles to race, because writers really struggle with not taking that shortcut.
Then make my own decision when I play the game.
On that note, the Gamespot video pseudo review is pretty good, at least through the first half. Pretty in depth, and hasn't strayed into identity politics so far.
LV Koopa
Jester from Hell
That's why I was watching the leaked gameplays to make a decision for myself. I don't take any reviewers seriously. Ages ago when paid reviews were no longer a secret I stopped fukking with any of those places heavy.
King Jove
King Of †he Gawds
It doesn't have a 99 on Metacritc? 
I'm cancelling my preorder. CDPR lied to us.
I'm cancelling my preorder. CDPR lied to us.
Th3G3ntleman
Superstar
Not all review sites use the same reviewer? Also bugs are generally speaking a situation which vary between users. One cat can play 80 hours of Ass creed and get no bugs and another can get like 10 bugs in 2 hours. It's how it works.
Me personally I just can't let bugs effect my experience that much. I've played some buggy bullshyt ass games like most Bethesda games. They suck to deal with but I personally would never change a numerical score because of bugs...unless a bug bricked the console or something crazy like that.
all these games are over hyped, people expecting 9/10s or the game is trash, that's how over hyped games are and this is no different
No solid gameplay footage and the game is days away from release, no playable demo, the game is trash, but people will act like its good because they already brought into the hype, just like that garbage last of us 2 with ps3 game mechanics in a new coat of paint
No solid gameplay footage and the game is days away from release, no playable demo, the game is trash, but people will act like its good because they already brought into the hype, just like that garbage last of us 2 with ps3 game mechanics in a new coat of paint
Th3G3ntleman
Superstar
Bruh? What? There has been hours of gameplay footage and walkthroughs on this game. What are you talking about?
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
It doesn't have a 99 on Metacritc?
hate to break it to you, games a flop!!!
