You don't sit that close to a tv breh. That's why people are calling it out.Look at multi-monitor setups on pcs, where they are spanning the desktop over 3 or more monitors. That will give you a clue as to whether its legit tech or not.
then this makes sense
scale that up
Ok, enough with pictures, but to explain, this is how we see the world. For thelike myself, you probably remember that tube tv's were not flat until the 90s. They were in fact, curved, but in the opposite direction. This was because the cathode ray gun was closer to curved in corners than flat corners. It took extra circuits and tech to make the screen flat and not have faded, blurry corners. Older projection tv's were the same way, but in the opposite direction. The projector was fixed in front of the screen and the screen was curved in the way you see these sets, but on both x and y. I mention this because, the projector guns are just like eyes in shape. This is how we see the world. Yes, a flat screen is pretty, but you will make out the corners better if they are curved inwards as well as it improving depth perception. This should go for all viewing angles, not just the center. Eventually, you will see the curve go to both plane. The idea of this being a fad or gimmick is simply incorrect. If it goes out, its because something better came out, but is is legit to the human eye.
The point is the flat panel TV market has hittin so saturated and competitive that manufactures need a gimmick to convince people to buy high end TVs
They can't nip it, people want to be portable.
3DTV was always a gimmick, that shyt was never going to take off. It causes too many problems for people who do not have perfect vision.I was believing this thread, why not believe it
But then I came across the bolded part and now I have to take this study and
Not all 3DTV's are the same. Some have 60hz refresh rates when you need at the very least 120
But 240 and up is recommended. I have a decent small sized 3DTV and I've watched Avatar, Alice in Wonderland, 3D Porn/etc. And all of those looked fantastic in 3D. So calling it a gimmick is bullshyt
Now my shawty got a crucial 3DTV in her living room. And the 3D on that looks better than the 3D in Imax
Watched Alice in wonderland again over there just last week
The end scene where she fights and beheads the dragon? Her running up that tower thingy?
If this researcher can get that wrong, I don't see why I should listen to his curved TV theory even if he is correct. I'd just rather see it from a more reliable source at this point imo
though i make fun of the kinect, the future of TVs will probably involve its features, albeit done much better. apple will probably be the company to do it.They can't nip it, people want to be portable.
The issue with TV is that its reaching a point of diminishing returns. I mean what else can they possibly do to get the screen looking even sharper? Are we going to squeeze in 4K into 32 inch TV's? Yeah I see that coming, but is it NECESSARY? That whole pixel pushing nonsense is still something that I see as absolutely ridiculous...people bragging about 1080P on their phones...a 5 inch screen
TBH a 800x480 resolution is STILL good enough on a 4 inch to 4.5 inch screen to me, all that other gimmicky shyt is corny to me.
I don't think curved screens are a gimmick though.
Yeah, you right
