COVID-19 Pandemic (Coronavirus)

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
49,973
Reputation
4,788
Daps
112,537
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Update (1435ET): County officials in Westchester have just confirmed that 8 people are under quarantine.

New York City has reiterated that it has zero confirmed cases.

Update (1345ET): If you're wondering what caused the latest leg lower in stocks, we believe we've found the answer: 83 people in Long Island's Nassau County are being monitored for coronavirus infection, threatening to make the CDC's warnings about imminent community outbreaks come true.

The story was initially reported by a local radio station before it was picked up by other local outlets.

Nassau County Executive Laura Curran told residents "do not panic" at a press conference. Six have been tested so far, five confirmed to not have it.



 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
40,249
Reputation
-36,117
Daps
227,249
Damn New York???


2890f9ee9eb1624c2ee38f2dc797331f.gif
 

Dave24

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
16,653
Reputation
1,438
Daps
22,531
In new research developments, a team from Wuhan, China, reports that even asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have abnormal lung findings on computed tomography (CT), and a group from Beijing noted that viral loads from infected patients appear to peak 5 to 6 days after symptom onset.

Both reports appeared yesterday in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

Images of disease at different points
The authors of the first study described chest CT findings from 42 men and 39 women admitted to one of two hospitals in Wuhan from December 20, 2019, to January 23, 2020, with COVID-19 pneumonia. All patients (mean age, 49.5 years) had a wide range of abnormal lung changes that spread rapidly from focused areas of excess fluid in one lung to diffuse buildup in both lungs.

Patients were grouped based on the length of time between the emergence of symptoms and first CT scan: group 1 (asymptomatic patients); group 2 (scans within seven days of symptom onset); group 3 (scans 8 days to 2 weeks after symptom onset); and group 4 (scans 15 days to 3 weeks after symptom onset).

Radiologists at the two hospitals, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital and Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, recorded and compared the patients' clinical and laboratory findings and co-existing diseases at initial and follow-up CT scans.

Wide range of lung abnormality patterns
Different radiolographic patterns emerged at different points of the disease. The mean number of affected lung segments was 10.5: 2.8 in group 1, 11.1 in group 2, 13.0 in group 3, and 12.1 in group 4. The right lower lobe of the lung had a slight tendency toward involvement.

In asymptomatic patients, 60% had abnormalities confined to one lung, while 90% of group 2 patients had abnormalities in both lungs. Those in groups 3 and 4 showed more mixed patterns and areas where fluid had replaced the air in the lung, leading to swelling and hardening of tissues.

This study helped further characterize CT findings in the lungs of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. With development of acute respiratory distress syndrome as few as 9 days after symptom onset, the researchers say that prompt diagnosis and treatment are paramount. "Combining assessment of imaging features with clinical and laboratory findings could facilitate early diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia," they wrote.

A diagnostic dilemma
In a commentary in the same journal, three radiologists from the University of Hong Kong said the varied presentations pose challenges when diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia.

"This small number of individuals with COVID-19 pneumonia poses a diagnostic dilemma given the varied manifestations, the experts wrote.

"There is more to be learnt about this novel contagious viral pneumonia; more research is needed into the correlation of CT findings with clinical severity and progression, the predictive value of baseline CT or temporal changes for disease outcome, and the sequelae of acute lung injury induced by COVID-19," they added.

Characterizing viral load
In a letter published in the same issue, researchers from the Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control describe patterns of viral load in clinical samples collected from 82 patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

The researchers collected serial throat swabs, sputum, urine, and stool samples from two hospitalized patients in Beijing and examined them using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Viral loads in the throat swabs and sputum peaked about 5 or 6 days after symptom onset, with sputum showing higher loads than throat samples. No viral RNA was identified in the urine or stool samples.

They also analyzed nasal, throat, and sputum samples from 80 patients in different stages of infection. In general, the viral load soon after onset was high. Two patients under surveillance due to their exposure to patients with COVID-19 tested positive a day before symptom onset, suggesting that people with the virus can be infectious before they have symptoms.

Nine stool samples from 17 patients with confirmed COVID-19 tested positive using qRT-PCR zero to 11 days after symptom onset. "Although the viral loads were less than those of respiratory samples…precautionary measures should be considered when handling [fecal] samples," the authors wrote.


Studies profile lung changes in asymptomatic COVID-19, viral loads in patient samples
 

85 East

DJ D'eeznuts
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
4,820
Reputation
1,888
Daps
16,142
If tests are going to be $3500 per in the US, you guys are kind of screwed. Imagine how fast this could spread in major cities where people can barely afford rent. This seems very odd and like a death wish for American citizens. I hope that's just bad info and not true at all. It's going to be time for a world wide revolution soon. It's clearly evident that the stress has been on the economy and not preventing this virus from spreading or preventing the loss of lives. We are merely cattle to the elite and their stock market. Sooner or later drastic measures will need to be taken if leaders continue to put money before humanity.
 

eXodus

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
8,152
Reputation
3,855
Daps
46,968
Reppin
NULL
"deadly virus".

I mean technically, its been deadly for people with compromised or weak immune systems but while the shyt isn't good, using this terminology here is hyperbolic :francis:. This phrasing does not match a mortality rate of 2%.
I agree, it’s inappropriate to have to use that adjective in headlines when talking about the virus.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
28,835
Reputation
4,851
Daps
46,019
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
"deadly virus".

I mean technically, its been deadly for people with compromised or weak immune systems but while the shyt isn't good, using this terminology here is hyperbolic :francis:. This phrasing does not match a mortality rate of 2%.

+ people who smoke, have hypertension, have diabetes .... and so on ..

the smoking one should be obvious given that this affects the respiratory system.

people develop pneumonia.

20% percent get very sick. possible hospitalization.

5% get critically ill.

CDC said 80% likely to get it (if it gets out of control).

Can I leave you to figure out what happens when that 20% needs hospitalization.

In Hubei where hospitals are overloaded morbidity rate is higher. 10% I heard but have not checked myself.

This inability / unwillingness of people to join the dots is disturbing

EDIT: I just found this

"Aylward said that across China, about 80% of cases are mild, about 14% are severe, and about 6% become critically ill. The case fatality rate — the percentage of known infected people who die — is between 2% and 4% in Hubei province, and 0.7% in other parts of China, he said."
New China coronavirus data buttress fears about high fatality rate - STAT

so 4% at the top end.. still bad and still developing.

if someone gave you a 1/25 chance of being flayed alive for 1million USD would you take it?
 
Last edited:
Top