COVID-19 Pandemic (Coronavirus)

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,225
Reputation
4,894
Daps
46,440
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
I'll amend my point. The virus in the primary form it is transferred from person to person in respiratory droplets falls quickly to the floor. Particles of it may remain in the air, those particles haven't been proven to cause infection in humans.



I am not going back and forth with you. And I will leave it at the following comments as long as you keep showing an inability to break down your own arguments. Breaking it down shows the logical gaps.

Now some quick points and I will leave you to connect the dots.

1. There is no virus "primary form" of transferal. The virus is the virus. If you mean medium, the medium is the same. The difference is one of size of the medium. Big drops are called "droplets". Small droplets are referred to as "aerosols". Aerosols are just droplets which are small enough to be suspended in the air.

2. Particles of "it" do not remain in the air. The virus is, like in the droplet case is suspended in a medium. The same medium (range /types in principle) in fact. Are free-floating virus particles out there? Possibly I haven't looked at it. But at those sizes with that low mass breaking tension would be a massive problem.

3. In the video when he says "particles" he is referring to the medium with the virus in it.

4. At no point did he rule it out. He suggested that it was a possibility. Adding that together with the other studies I provided is wholly consistent and together they lead us to the conclusion that aerosolised transmission can occur. This is simple logic.

5. Medium is some form of fluid. Sputum, phlegm, water, saliva .. etc

6. Your use of "hasn't been proven to" is misplaced.

For example:

It hasn't "been proven" that CV infects people while they are eating ice-cream.
It hasn't been proven that CV infects people while they are shagging big-butt Mary Sue.
It hasn't been proven that CV infects people while they are posting on the coli.

In other words you don't just add random qualifiers and state it "hasn't been proven".

You work from the principles of science and break in down into the known mechanical steps and analyze from there.

So in response my three fatuous examples the question would be "scientifically speaking what effect would Big Butts :shaq:, ice-cream :takedat:and thecoli :wow:forum have on the mechanics that we know". Likewise with aerosols you need to establish based on known or probable mechanics why aerosolisation would rule transmission out.

--

Your rational is all over the place which is why you are trying to dance around the clear evidence that I have provided.

Once again: Droplets and Aerosols are fundamentally the same. The difference is size - of the medium and (most likely) the viral load.

:ufdup: If you collect those aerosols (by any means) and breathe them in then the virus will have 100% have entered your body.

ZTR4Qn4.png


Aerosolization - Wikipedia

Apologies for the switching between US/UK spelling on occasion. I will try and cut it out.
 
Last edited:

Trojan 24

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,210
Reputation
3,239
Daps
141,588
Reppin
Just Win Baby
If you have the Rona they won’t test you unless you have a fever or shortness of breathe. They wouldn’t even test me :francis:

Yep if you don't feel right you better off lying and say you're having trouble catching your breath and having tightness in your chest. But even then. Of course if you're perfectly fine don't be doing that
 

ALonelyDad

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
73,964
Reputation
8,662
Daps
326,449
Yep if you don't feel right you better off lying and say you're having trouble catching your breath and having tightness in your chest. But even then. Of course if you're perfectly fine don't be doing that
Even tightness in chest won’t do anything, well at least here in LA area. They only determine it by high fever or oxygen level
 
Top