I don't love that she did that shyt, but it was the law at the time. The Biden administration has been great for weed
Yeah like I said you feel bad for when law and order does what it was created to do, other than that you see nothing wrong with it.
Who said it’s just?Yeah cause if trump doesn't get elected that means justice system will be just. Let's hope for Sonya's case won't be like blands, Taylor's, etc....
Meaning they'll stop playing theater when it comes the majority of incidents.Who said it’s just?
One side is openly stating that they will give cops total immunity and want to execute drug offenders.
Would that be worse than the current system?
There's no confusion on my end, that's why I don't care about the shaming tactics to voteuhhh, yeah? I'm not seeing the cause for confusion.
Just like a parent can be thankful for public schools and what not and still voice their issues when they situation or calls for it.
Meaning they'll stop playing theater when it comes the majority of incidents.
There's no confusion on my end, that's why I don't care about the shaming tactics to vote
Sure we'll see if kamala loses. Maybe this time you guys will blame yourselvesBreh
Nobody cares if you vote or not at the end of the day. Especially on here. You'd be one out millions who for whatever reason don't vote.
Sure we'll see if kamala loses. Maybe this time you guys will blame yourselves
I just asked a question and you didn’t answer it. Whether or not these laws exist today is irrelevant to the basic question that I asked.
I didn't need to do any homework because I already know the answer. Your initial statement shows me that you don't. You didn't post any receipts. The question was, how many black people did Kamala put in jail due to truancy. The video you posted doesn't answer that question. Your dumbass can't even find the answer and it has been posted in this very thread. Can't educate dumb ass nikkas like you because you'd rather stay stupid. Posting thecoli smilies ain't saving you nikka.
The answer is yes and no...
The only person who is rationalizing is you. Everything I said was factual, and based on comparison to her predecessor she was lenient as many of her prosecutions with lesser offenses didn't receive jail time and were given minimal alternatives.However you attempt to rationalize it, nothing will change the fact that she was an active part of the police state and an active participant in a system of black subjugation.
And the same way you can rationalize that she was "lenient" - which she was not. She also targeted poor black parents for truancy cases - and laughed about it openly.
Wrong is wrong. She was an abhorrent disgusting prosecutor just like her predecessor and successor.
Quit with your thinly veiled fallacious relative privation.
If they even take convincing at this point and are still forcefully repeating long debunked talking points, they weren't serious anyway.If Trump being elected is such a dire thing then you don't get to choose how to talk to the very people you're trying to convince in the first place. This is something that is constantly lost on some people then they flip out when those people they're trying to convince don't listen.
Whether I'm voting or not is irrelevant.
Being critical of politicians, their stances and whether or not they plan to deliver on their platform
SHOULD be the focus.