Some of these stances are absurd and extreme, a reactive indictment to a crime of violence is way different then a proactive indictment.
Trump so bad wants to say this and brag that he can't be touched.
I hear it, but I'm not buying it. If you're that much of a Patriot and you believe that Trump is bad/wrong/criminal/etc, you need to say that then, especially if you've just spent the past 2 years leading a special council investigation into the matter.
I'd go so far as to say you owe it to the American people to put it all the way out there.
Detroit gotta save the free world :rtlaibgrin:Just spoke to someone from my local reps office, she stated as of today he signing on as a co sponsor to H.Res 257 which is Rep Tlaib's bill to start the impeachment inquiry. Put those calls in.
He will try. And as long as people like McConnell lead the Senate anything is possible.That nikka cant be President forever
When one side is operating in bad faith, "neutral" statements like this are nothing but spin fodder. Our institutions are clearly rotten and failing to serve the people, so stop speaking like an institutionalist and speak in plain, common language that can't be misconstrued.Truth be told, we have become so politicized as a nation that we forgot what a completely neutral statement sounds like.
No trolling. No insults. Legit conversation. Can someone lay out a legitimate impeachment based on current facts would lead to the removal of Trump?
No trolling. No insults. Legit conversation. Can someone lay out a legitimate impeachment based on current facts would lead to the removal of Trump?
Another one worth checking out is David Feldman, specifically when he gets Howie Klein from down with tyranny on.
There is a processKind of disappointing. He's a by the book guy. Trump wins this one, I guess.
Mueller had a spark when he started but now.............
Only thing left to do now is vote Trump out. That's all we can do.
If he's not being removed from office then how is he really being held accountable? In this situation you could just do a bunch of public hearings to show why he shouldn't be re-elected in 2020. It would basically be the same thing.Frank,
We know the Senate won't vote to remove him. That is not the point. The point is to hold him accountable for his actions. If you need to know what those were...you can start with Nap's thread which you fully participated in and then this one, which you too participated in. I didnt know all branches had work simultaneously, to make shyt happen. They can start with Russian interference continue with the griftng taking place in his administration and end with his financial crimes, everyday, on tv for all to see. I get your disappointed and have turned in Acri 2.0 but lets not act like Trump hasnt committed plenty of impeachable offenses.
Also, do you think the Democrats should stop crafting and passing legislation in the house, even though they know McConnell might not bring it to the floor? The house has passed 249 bills since January, should they just do nothing because the Senate wont vote? No trolling.
I see your point but if you don't start the impeachment proceedings when this guy is doing stuff that's blatantly illegal... what happens when someone who is smarter and much more subtle comes around?If he's not being removed from office then how is he really being held accountable? In this situation you could just do a bunch of public hearings to show why he shouldn't be re-elected in 2020. It would basically be the same thing.