China writing reports on how they can son us

[nineteeneightysix]

This is actually good news for the world...

Realistically, I got no beef with the USA, but it's a bully country...Of course, as a Canadian, I know the USA offers us protection, and thus, I ALWAYS want to see the USA come out on top, because when the USA is on top, Canada greatly benefits...

Idealistically, I can't rock with the USA way of thinking...It's not enough for Americans to be on top, everybody else must be at the bottom...

Sometimes, the USA reminds me of that anti-social nerd at school who is not happy when he scores an A+ on an exam, if there is another kid in the class who also got an A+...He wants to be the only with an A+, so all the other kids can envy him and ask him for help with their homework...

 

[kevm3]

Great thing we sent all of our manufacturing over there and allow them to hold a significant portion of our debt.

 

[newworldafro]

I was listening to radio broadcast tonite......did yall know that China get their gas from Iraq for $2/gallon .......... this is, according to the host and guest, because they let us borrow money from them, and so it is a form of payment..... ......... also, according to the host/guest, there are several thousand Chinese miners in Afghanistan extracting all kinds of raw material goodies, and they were complaining that their citizens weren't getting enough military security protection from the U.S. ......

How accurate that is ^^^^ IDK but this is what I found on the mineshttps://www.google.com/#q=chinese+miners+in+afghanistan ,

but I have heard about the Iraq oil and China situation several years ago ..... cotdamn $2/gallon though

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

they're not doing shyt. Our economies depend on each other too much to go to war.

plus half of china lives like its 1895

 

[88m3]

sounds like america.

and anyone thinking the U.S can win a war with another nuclear armed country is disillusioned by patriotism.

one thing is for sure, the chinese can live in difficult situations, whereas america would pretty much throw itself into anarchy with no electricity for 7 days. see katrina.

See the East Coast after Hurricane Sandy, dikk.

Anyways China's Navy is an utter joke.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Liberation_Army_Navy_Submarine_Force
http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/ming.aspx
Can't even operate on Germany's WW2 sub level and China is still using diesel engines. Captain Willenbrock would be ashamed.


Submarines are incredibly easy to track via satellite and airplane.
We just refocused our Navies in the Pacific as well.

Everyone loses in Nuclear war, China knows that.

Russia and China aren't that close either.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

See the East Coast after Hurricane Sandy, dikk.

Anyways China's Navy is an utter joke.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Liberation_Army_Navy_Submarine_Force
http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/ming.aspx
Can't even operate on Germany's WW2 sub level and China is still using diesel engines. Captain Willenbrock would be ashamed.


Submarines are incredibly easy to track via satellite and airplane.
We just refocused our Navies in the Pacific as well.

Everyone loses in Nuclear war, China knows that.

Russia and China aren't that close either.

I didn't mention anything about their navy, and um, I just said everyone loses in a nuclear war. So I have no idea who you're arguing with.

China is showing a graph of their nuclear subs, in case they want to use them...but um...they have ICBMs that can hit all of America.
I have no idea why you're making it seem like China wants to hit the U.S first, we all know that if shyt hits the fan who caused it....the only pro-war country on the security council.

China has never initiated a war, they are not war-like people.

 

[88m3]

I didn't mention anything about their navy, and um, I just said everyone loses in a nuclear war. So I have no idea who you're arguing with.

China is showing a graph of their nuclear subs, in case they want to use them...but um...they have ICBMs that can hit all of America.

Their submarines couldn't make it far enough to actually use them.

The rest is for everyone's benefit.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

Their submarines couldn't make it far enough to actually use them.

The rest is for everyone's benefit.

They've snuck up on U.S fleets numerous times. google it. again I fail to see how their subs are significant in a war with the U.S when they can just launch ICBMs, they are just showing what their subs can reach if need be.

 

[88m3]

They've snuck up on U.S fleets numerous times. google it. again I fail to see how their subs are significant in a war with the U.S when they can just launch ICBMs, they are just showing what their subs can reach if need be.

What numerous times, this is all I've found.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/nov/13/20061113-121539-3317r/?page=all

And

The surfaced submarine was spotted by a routine surveillance flight by one of the carrier group’s planes.

The Kitty Hawk battle group includes an attack submarine and anti-submarine helicopters that are charged with protecting the warships from submarine attack.

Sounds like fleet wasn't following procedure and it was a pre-announced exercise. Both Admirals in the article were apparently sacked after the incident. Edit: One was on his way out, the other was passed over for the position.

Further reading
http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2006/11/inside-job.html

As far as the ICBMs Star Wars and shyt

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

they have ICBMs that can hit all of America.

Google Air Defense Artillery.​

 

[Tommy Knocks]

What numerous times, this is all I've found.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/nov/13/20061113-121539-3317r/?page=all

And



Sounds like fleet wasn't following procedure and it was a pre-announced exercise. Both Admirals in the article were apparently sacked after the incident. Edit: One was on his way out, the other was passed over for the position.

Further reading
http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2006/11/inside-job.html

As far as the ICBMs Star Wars and shyt

yep that's it, and another one just off japan.


and you can't possibly think the air defense shield would work against numerous chinese icbms? common sense alone should tell you that's impossible. 1 N.K ICBM, sure, but 30 chinese icmbs in the air at the same time??? cmon now.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

Google Air Defense Artillery.​

it would be like trying to hit a volley ball with another volley ball in mid air. you can demonstrate how it's 'possible' by knocking 1 out the air, but you're not proving you can hit every single one, with 30 in the sky

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

it would be like trying to hit a volley ball with another volley ball in mid air. you can demonstrate how it's 'possible' by knocking 1 out the air, but you're not proving you can hit every single one, with 30 in the sky

LOL @ you thinking they would even launch that many at once, let alone our Carrier Groups + Subs all capable of Sea-to-Air ICBM interception.

They'd have to jam ALL our satellites to get even one into range of our airspace without us being able to shoot it down.

I'm not saying we're invincible, but we've been planning for something like that for a very long time.​

 

[Rice N Beans]

You really think China is dumb enough to try and drop them thangz on the US of A?

I'm no warhawk but we are fukking loaded and the country that strikes we may as well begin on drawing new maps for that area.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

LOL @ you thinking they would even launch that many at once, let alone our Carrier Groups + Subs all capable of Sea-to-Air ICBM interception.

They'd have to jam ALL our satellites to get even one into range of our airspace without us being able to shoot it down.s as

I'm not saying we're invincible, but we've been planning for something like that for a very long time.​

lol @ you thinking ICBMs are just sea to air. LOL. completely forgetting land to land. whoops.

another LOL @ you thinking the chinese do not have the capability of jamming U.S satellites as well.

I dont think you know much about the chinese military.