AnonymityX1000
Veteran
What was wack about the fighting scenes?Movie wasn't good to me . Thought the fighting scenes was wack. Main villain boring.
If Bvs didn't have that trash version of lex Luthor I might consider it better
What was wack about the fighting scenes?Movie wasn't good to me . Thought the fighting scenes was wack. Main villain boring.
If Bvs didn't have that trash version of lex Luthor I might consider it better
You right it wasn't that wack. Just seemed like they wasn't fighting to kill in the big battle sceneWhat was wack about the fighting scenes?
Strait Fire
Lets talk about how the best marvel villain ever was a regular human being who used patience and intelligence to split up the avengers
You REALLY thought going into that shyt that they were trying to kill each other?You right it wasn't that wack. Just seemed like they wasn't fighting to kill in the big battle scene
Because they weren't.You right it wasn't that wack. Just seemed like they wasn't fighting to kill in the big battle scene
so we just letting incredibly bad writing fly now because its a comic book movie? this why i didn't even want to post because like I said its no real critical discussion in here, just a circle jerk.
I'm waiting on that Best Buy steelbook.Pre-ordered the Blu-ray even though I know I'll probably cancel for a store exclusive
@HHR @MartyMcFly :goldblum:
CW didn't have 8 scenes of action in total so why is BvS held to a different standard.
We have
Opening cinematic
BP Chase scene
Airport
Final fight
both movies are like 150 minutes with roughly the same amount of action, equally hokey in places plots, one has much better actors, yet one is like 30% on RT and one is like 90 iirc %
somethings not adding up
It's the studios. Disney has everyone in their pocket. WB, not so much.
All I wanna know is when did Marvel start paying for good reviews. Was it way back at Iron Man 1 when they got 94% RT, or only after Disney purchased it? If after, which film specifically. And if Disney is paying off critics, why didn't they pay off those John Carter critics who gave bad reviews? That film was supposed to be the start of a trilogy, and the evil empire couldn't secure a 90% RT for it? Instead they lost so much money, the head of the studio resigned? Or what about Tomorrowland? That film lost $140 million and was supposed to kickstart a new wave of Disney attractions turning into films. Why didn't Disney secure the critics for that film?
Something ain't adding up.
superhero movies have a much higher stock in this Era than anything.
Its clear some of these muthafukkas aint gettin no attention at homeDisney pumped $500 million+ in those two films. Explain how and why Disney didn't have "everyone" in their pockets then.
John Carter had a bigger budget than the Avengers.