In a little way that's what im saying "if" we follow that logic of It's hard to differentiate comic book movies to the point if one does bad the others might get hit with a stray because the audience might attach that 1st film bad reception to the other CBM's thats following up from a different brands...so every movie film brand just need to raise the bar and don't blame the audience, fan boys and the critics for they short coming which I feel like the twitter dude is trying to do. Like you said you need competition but what happens if the opposing team dont brings its A-game to the competition, your going to have to charge it to the game because the competition didnt do they job well. The experience leaves a bad taste in everyone's mouth, with that you cant blame the negative response from the audience . Which go back to the we need each other statment, yeah but if someone isnt pulling his or her weight your just stuck seething silently putting blame on unnecessary and wrongfully reason towards audience/fans/the watchers
CW didn't do 200 in opening BO could mean many things or reasons, fatigue is just one that you could make a point or the lackluster movie before it. Alot of people dont know the different between comic book movie brands in America( Marvel, Sony, Fox, WB )but now I think its slowly changing to the point people can tell it apart. Also you can make a point about all these comic book shows popping up now film leaks from CW before it drops in the U.S harm the opening
On the wrestling thing with McMahan buying other companies, it's funny because Marvel shop captain America and thor to WB which would've happen if they deal didn't take so long. It didn't matter when universal had hulk, new line had deadpool and iron man, when Sony had spiderman, Fox with x-men etc why does it now