I'm with it but I've heard that described as 'piecemealing'Nope, the goal is to do one in each state - slave states and non-slave states.
Then we are going after National Government and the companies that benefited as well -- that's the bigger one.
I'm with it but I've heard that described as 'piecemealing'Nope, the goal is to do one in each state - slave states and non-slave states.
Then we are going after National Government and the companies that benefited as well -- that's the bigger one.
I cant find any information on black immigrants in the US pre 1900s. If the number is really that small then I dont thinks it's worth the effort to exclude them if their ancestors have been here long enough to not have records of immigration. I dont even know how we'd go about doing that without mandatory DNA testing.
How much is plenty? And what do you do if someone immigrated before they started keeping a record of who immigrated and who was born a slave?That's exactly the argument. But plenty of people came over from Cuba, Jamaica and the West Indies.
Their records are there.How much is plenty? And what do you do if someone immigrated before they started keeping a record of who immigrated and who was born a slave?
Were there even enough black immigrants RIGHT after slavery to waste the effort researching it in order to exclude their descendants?
Weren't some of the free black folk buying their family members? I've read that not all black slave owners bought slaves with ill intentions.I think Florida and NYC would have the best records for that. Those two places are where most immigrated too. I would say some definitely have a claim. But, it does get tricky -- cause some of those "Free Colored" were enslavers and brought their enslaved with them --and went on to enslaved more Black people.
But, even under the guidelines for California -- they would qualify -- the descendents.
So, again they can only try and see.
The first significant wave of recent Caribbean immigration occurred during the first three decades of the 20th century, particularly during World War I and throughout the 1920s. Before this time, Caribbean migration was primarily internal as migrants sought economic opportunities in other islands and nations throughout the Caribbean basin.
The eruption of the Haitian Revolution in 1791 sent another wave of migration from the Caribbean region. From the 1790s until approximately 1810, thousands of white, free colored, and some enslaved black Haitian refugees relocated to coastal cities such as Savannah, Charleston, Norfolk, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York, and especially to New Orleans.
Weren't some of the free black folk buying their family members? I've read that not all black slave owners bought slaves with ill intentions.
Seems like there's alot of nuance to the discussion that isnt talked about enough.
If there's records then it's not up for debate.Their records are there.
Immigration records for all who came over. Especially Black Immigrants.
I'm with it but I've heard that described as 'piecemealing'
If there's records then it's not up for debate.
Effectively chipping away and usurping reparations on the federal levelExplain what that means....
I have to read through the thread but u keep talking in circlesJust because you can doesn’t mean others could do the same. Lots of names just lead to a dead end.
I have to read through the thread but u keep talking in circles
if reparations actually goes through, it’s not going to be Everyman for themselves lol
there are going to be whole institutions built for the very purpose of making a claim. It’s not going to be dependent on nikkas using ancestry.com
there are going to be temp offices like tax offices ,sprouting up all around the country to get people an accurate claim
Not sure, it was extremely small. I would have to do some searching.
It was more Caribbeans than Africans immigrating in during the end of the 1800's.
I cant find any information on black immigrants in the US pre 1900s. If the number is really that small then I dont thinks it's worth the effort to exclude them if their ancestors have been here long enough to not have records of immigration. I dont even know how we'd go about doing that without mandatory DNA testing.

I see what they are saying -- but I think we will be ok. We can also go after companies as well.Effectively chipping away and usurping reparations on the federal level