BREAKING: School shooting in Uvalde, Texas. 21 dead including shooter. (RIP to the victims)

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
102,377
Reputation
13,269
Daps
241,556
you do realze that a significant number of white nationalists are devout christians?
You can't be a white nationalist and a Christian so no that's not true. I guess you can believe you're one while using your church as a front for white shyt.

Mass shooters are definitely not Christian because what has been documented about their beliefs says they are atheist and anti religious. Atheists make up 3 percent of the population but seem to be accounting for an overwhelming majority of mass shootings so to me the problem is clear. The homes of mass shooters.
 

King Jove

King Of †he Gawds
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
33,436
Reputation
10,389
Daps
202,969
Reppin
[redacted]


these cacs always have the audacity :gucci:
Dude is getting rightfully eaten up in the comments :pacspit:


The places where people come from to move here, the US had a hand in why they wanted move in the first place. :mjlol:

Why is there such a low number of immigrants from Western European countries? :jbhmm:
 

TheJet

Superstar
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
9,966
Reputation
1,101
Daps
21,897
While the easy access and availability of guns is the root of the problem, ignoring/poo-pooing the fact that these types of shootings are overwhelmingly committed by young, white males is a disservice.
^^^that's exactly what Marjorie Taylor Greene is trying to do
America has a white male extremist problem. No matter what the impetus of that extremism is (racism, autism, incel culture, anti-government sentiments, gambling debts, idiocy, or whatever), the fact is they are a proven danger to ANY mass gathering of people.

Making guns harder to access is the main solution but one that has been proven almost impossible (unless you’re a Black Panther). The only thing I can hope to see in the short-term are more extensive background checks across the board

Monitoring and infiltrating these breeding grounds where dangerous white males gather is a more fathomable, short-term solution. If they can monitor every rapper and gang member’s social media (there’s a massive gang takedown every week in America), they can damn sure sniff out freaks who would be prone to doing something this.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
102,377
Reputation
13,269
Daps
241,556
Home is indeed where the heart is and some people should not be parents because they are unqualified

High schools having heavily regulated dorms might be an option, but the right wouldnt let that fly because of the vast amount of spending that would require in the form of construction and staff compensation. There would also be an issue of consent, capacity to house the amounts necessary and oftentimes the simple lack of land that would be needed.

This is a very complex issue and it's a hard sell to Americans to just tell them they arent good enough to be parents. Further, in order for that to be passable, there would have to be some sort of quantifiable metric as well as a level of intrusion into family affairs that would be seen as encroachment. You know this would not be acceptable with how many are railing against school curriculums not jiving with their own personal beliefs.

In one way or another you are hinting towards the need for the government to be the nanny state that conservatives often demonize. The only alternative to that amenable to the right wing would be to privatize the school system but that would also be a bureaucratic and logistical nightmare that would leave many children and families even further behind than they currently are.

One thing that may be possible is to straight up ban anyone under the age of 18 to use the internet at all outside of an educational facility or library that is heavily censored but I'm not sure how that would be enforced either outside of giving codes out to adults used to access any internet connection that is tied to some sort of identification and there we are again at limiting rights that wouldnt garner a majority in the senate
Incentivized nannisism. Sponsor grounded programs that are proven to work and incentivize families / individuals who fit the mass shooter profile to use them. Some programs mandatory given specific case criteria with consequences in the event Jr turns into a freak. There's a thin line and sadly Americans other social issues make addressing this one difficult and complex like you said.

The gov bans guns then has to fight citizens on top of trying to combat a rising 3d printer market. Guns are the culture here. It's not changing so finding more innovative/scientific ways for these atheists to get the help they need will be important.

In my opinion.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,131
Reputation
6,799
Daps
143,869
Reppin
CookoutGang
What do all these shooters have in common most of time.

1. Atheist / Agnostic
2. Abusive families
3. Neglect
4. Bullying

The answer isn't to let these things continue and ban guns. The answer is to address these issues with more outreach programs and maybe even mandatory parenting programs for people under the age of 25.

Obviously more grounded reality based scriptures would help.
I see you didn't try to bjj your way out of this one. :russ:
 

Brief Keef

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
19,741
Reputation
2,025
Daps
29,286
FTjWFD1XwAUIYaJ



FTjWIzWWIAIx19I


FTjWOTbXsAAZJe-


FTjWG3YXoAExAja
So that airhead didn't put two and two together and that he might be actually planning to do some crazy shyt ?
 
Top