Roberts not wanting to overrule Roe further proves the Ginsburg argument correct. If she had retired and everything happened as it did - Trump win etc - there would be a 5-4 conservative majority. And with Roberts unwilling to overturn it he’d join with the 4 liberals and create a majority.
Instead we have three liberals because of the arrogance and hubris of one woman.
Spent her last years on Earth having to bounce back and forth from surgeries and work instead of relaxing in peace because she didn't want to retire. I know she regretted that decision every day her last few years. Now, I do think she's being used as a scapegoat somewhat. Republicans would've STILL tried to not accept Obama's pick if Ginsburg stepped down in 2013...by basically saying what Mitch is saying today ("We're not confirming anyone else for Biden if Dems lose the Midterms") because IIRC, the Dems lost the midterms in 2014. Alot of anger should be directed towards the system and towards the Dems for playing so fukkin weak against the Republicans who have shown 1,000 times they don't GAF. There should be rules in place that prohibit stalling a sitting President for
YEARS only to ram your picks through in two weeks when its your party, or some sort of investigative body overseeing discrepant voting behavior like that for potential bias and making Congressmen explain why they did certain things. I always personally thought it was crazy that lawyers, judges and doctors (and others) have licenses that they could lose if they did anything unethical but, Congress? Nah. I get that their politicians from rival parties but, for some things, I feel Congressmen should be forced to follow the rules on and confirming picks without trying to stall is one of them. I'll fault Ginsburg maybe 60 percent.
cause it's so incredulous while we got all these fools in our community carrying water for these demons.
