Even worse for his argument. It's really not the same. Like I get it he's a stan but damn these stans just straight up lying now.
Bloomberg’s Jason Schrier: "Xbox is a 'mess' right now, Plans change every year, Teasing "Handheld" right now"
- Thread starter Gizmo_Duck
- Start date
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Thats why im not arguing with them lol
This what I'm talking about you reaching all over the place.
Then please don't ever "associate" Halo with Microsoft or Gears.
They were "bought" when they were already being developed by Bungie and Epic Games.
This makes your argument even worse.
I said the IP wasn't Created by Sony, you crashing out talking about don't associate halo with MS
what else you gonna associate it with I never said disassociate games, simply the games created while actually under Sony are Sony created IPs, the ones that aren't... aren't. Sony owned IPs sure.
Sounds like you think Spiderman is a Sony created IP too at this rate
Bro I'm not arguing with you anymore. You're just being intentionally obtuse now.This what I'm talking about you reaching all over the place.
I said the IP wasn't Created by Sony, you crashing out talking about don't associate halo with MS
I never said disassociate games, simply the games created while actually under Sony are Sony created IPs, the ones that aren't... aren't. Sony owned IPs sure.
Sounds like you think Spiderman is a Sony created IP too at this rate
I literally said outside of the cases were the own the rights out the gate.
I guess sunset overdrive is a Sony created IP then also right?
See how quickly narrative falls apart.
Ratchet and clank and a handful of other titles are titles that even though Sony didn't own them they basically collab'd with closely and are "Sony created" IPs at least in part.
But you trying to act like Sony had a part in everything is
So me reiterating what I said, and it not being what you jump off the porch about is ME be obtuse.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
That doesn’t apply to most of those studios you mentioned outside of Spyro and Crash. Sure sony acquired ownership of Sunset Overdrive but its also not an active IP so it doesn’t really apply to the discussion.
Spiderman was created by Stan LeeThis what I'm talking about you reaching all over the place.
I said the IP wasn't Created by Sony, you crashing out talking about don't associate halo with MS
I never said disassociate games, simply the games created while actually under Sony are Sony created IPs, the ones that aren't... aren't. Sony owned IPs sure.
Sounds like you think Spiderman is a Sony created IP too at this rate
A publishers job is to fund games.
Sony stans like to come up with these romanticized ideas of what sony is doing vs microsoft, but in reality as publishers their Job is the same.
Whether it’s a first party game or a 3rd party game. Their job is take a game pitch from a dev and decide if they feel that game is worth the investment.
Splitting hairs over exact contract details is just stan shyt so you can say “sony good, Microsoft Bad”
The biggest difference between sony and microsoft in the past is they when sony decided to fund a game they would negotiate ownership of the IP or studio. Microsoft did not stipulate ownership in their contracts in the past. Now they’ve changed that strategy to more in line with what sony has always done and they’ve decided to buy the studio for games they want to fund.
Ultimately, like i said they are both just doing what a publisher is supposed to do
Sony stans like to come up with these romanticized ideas of what sony is doing vs microsoft, but in reality as publishers their Job is the same.
Whether it’s a first party game or a 3rd party game. Their job is take a game pitch from a dev and decide if they feel that game is worth the investment.
Splitting hairs over exact contract details is just stan shyt so you can say “sony good, Microsoft Bad”
The biggest difference between sony and microsoft in the past is they when sony decided to fund a game they would negotiate ownership of the IP or studio. Microsoft did not stipulate ownership in their contracts in the past. Now they’ve changed that strategy to more in line with what sony has always done and they’ve decided to buy the studio for games they want to fund.
Ultimately, like i said they are both just doing what a publisher is supposed to do
ExactlyA publishers job is to fund games.
Sony stans like to come up with these romanticized ideas of what sony is doing vs microsoft, but in reality as publishers their Job is the same.
Whether it’s a first party game or a 3rd party game. Their job is take a game pitch from a dev and decide if they feel that game is worth the investment.
Splitting hairs over exact contract details is just stan shyt so you can say “sony good, Microsoft Bad”
The biggest difference between sony and microsoft in the past is they when sony decided to fund a game they would negotiate ownership of the IP or studio. Microsoft did not stipulate ownership in their contracts in the past. Now they’ve changed that strategy to more in line with what sony has always done and they’ve decided to buy the studio for games they want to fund.
Ultimately, like i said they are both just doing what a publisher is supposed to do
I mean according to Gizmo and fat insomniac wasn't popping until spiderman released as a Sony created IP.Spiderman was created by Stan Lee
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Never said that at all. Insomniac has been pretty much a 2nd party studio since the 90’s
Again, which is why tthey only cost sony 200m to acquire, their two biggest games at the time (resistance and R&C) were owned by sony
You just going to conveniently leave off spiderman... The game that drop a year before Sony purchased them.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
You just going to conveniently leave off spiderman... The game that drop a year before Sony purchased them.
So is it their two biggest game series are R&C and resistance and that's why they cost 200 million or is it not?
Because Spiderman is a pretty popular guy, and that game was a hit for insomniac. So you saying insomniac just sold for the low because they cool after having major success with a Major IP?
Because Spiderman is a pretty popular guy, and that game was a hit for insomniac. So you saying insomniac just sold for the low because they cool after having major success with a Major IP?
