Yeah and every game sony or From has made since then is 10+ Mill.
Bloodborne is AWESOME
- Thread starter The Frozen One
- Start date
That was 4 years ago before Elden Ring sold 20mil.From has said they're doing the Sonic *impatient toe tap* and looking at Sony. The ball was in their court to give the green light.
Souls Director Miyazaki Says Making Bloodborne 2 Isn't His Call
Sony, we're waitingwww.pushsquare.com
And I mean they could've got the ball rolling on this at any point in the last 8-9 years. It'll probably never happen now for the reasons you said but they've had damn near a decade prior to now and put in zero effort to make it happen.
Fred.
Why in the hell would they chose to work on A franchise for sony that sold 3mil. When they have multiple 10+ million sales franchises of their own to work on??
No, it’s not. Sony wants hits, not merely “profitable” games.
this is where you stan yourself retarded.
a game doesn't have to sell 5 mill plus to be a hit.
Knack got a sequel for christ's sakes.
it it more than exceeded sales forecasts and expectations, it's fine. And it just didn't do it. It was in year 2 of the PS4
Question is why not push for a sequel? It's Sony's IP, maybe drop it on the 6
How many Knack style games sony working on right now?this is where you stan yourself retarded.
a game doesn't have to sell 5 mill plus to be a hit.
Knack got a sequel for christ's sakes.
it it more than exceeded sales forecasts and expectations, it's fine. And it just didn't do it. It was in year 2 of the PS4
Question is why not push for a sequel? It's Sony's IP, maybe drop it on the 6
If it’s such a no brainer why isn’t sony working on a bloodborn sequel? Hell they didn’t even think a remaster was worth it, and the LOVE remasters.
It ain’t me stanning in here. As usual the truth makes you guys uncomfortable.
Sony and especially From would be absolutely stupid to divert resources from their hit Franchises to reach for another go around with Bloodborne.
This also goes back to the reporting about the costs and motivations for AAA titles that y’all were in denial about.
6-7 years and 200 million dollar investment. That gotta be a sure hit. Nobody wanna spend all that time and money for a modest profit.
wasn't a modest profit.
met expectations = modest
exceeded = did very well
And this is FROM we're talkin about. They will not take 6-7 years to do BB2.
You don’t have any idea what “expectations” were or what the Profit of the title was.wasn't a modest profit.
met expectations = modest
exceeded = did very well
And this is FROM we're talkin about. They will not take 6-7 years to do BB2.
You do know their next games made 5-10x the $ they made on that one.
Again, why the hell would they go back, just to help sony sell some consoles?
We see where that has gotten square.
Why do you keep talking about now?
The game came out in 2015. In 2015, "Bloodborne" was selling the same as the rest of From's games....which is in the 2-3 million range.
Dark Souls series sales surpass 8.5 million
The brilliant Dark Souls series has surpassed 8.5m sales, and more than 3.25m of those were on PC. The numbers come fro…
www.eurogamer.net
From in 2015 is not From of 2023. They had ZERO "hits" on the level you're talking about. Im asking why didnt they ever greenlight a sequel then, not post-"Elden Ring".
Fred.
DS3 was their next game. They sold 10+mill with that one.
Why do you keep talking about now?
The game came out in 2015. In 2015, "Bloodborne" was selling the same as the rest of From's games....which is in the 2-3 million range.
Dark Souls series sales surpass 8.5 million
The brilliant Dark Souls series has surpassed 8.5m sales, and more than 3.25m of those were on PC. The numbers come fro…
From in 2015 is not From of 2023. They had ZERO "hits" on the level you're talking about. Im asking why didnt they ever greenlight a sequel then, not post-"Elden Ring".
Fred.
Ship sailed on bloodborn a long time ago
You don’t have any idea what “expectations” were or what the Profit of the title was.
You do know their next games made 5-10x the $ they made on that one.
Again, why the hell would they go back, just to help sony sell some consoles?
We see where that has gotten square.
Sony owns the IP and funded the game . This isn't anything close to the Square situaion.
They can do the same thing they did the last time.
you sure love being contrarian just to hate on Sony.
With Elden Ring's success, they can drop BB2 and you can take your nephew's Playstation again to play it.
Has nothing to do with Sony hate.Sony owns the IP and funded the game . This isn't anything close to the Square situaion.
They can do the same thing they did the last time.
you sure love being contrarian just to hate on Sony.
With Elden Ring's success, they can drop BB2 and you can take your nephew's Playstation again to play it.
You guys are in denial due to sony Fandom.
Just knowing what you know about gaming, which is sony studio is working on a game that might “just” sale about 2-3 mill?
No one of them. Sony is championship or bust these days.
Batsute
The Lion Choker
The same reason Itsuno wanted to make Dragons Dogma 2, Rival Schools 3, & DMC 5.
The same reason Kamiya wanted to make another Viewtiful Joe, Ōkami, or Bayonetta.
These designers are artists at heart and still have a passion to further develop these worlds they build.
Bloodborne Sales Surprised Sony
"We were being quite ambitious, but even that proved to be conservative."
www.gamespot.com
They can sell those games on all platforms.
BB would be exclusive. Meaning Sony would have to pay for like 10 million copies.
Not worth the risk for either party when From can Just make elden ring 2 and sony can make another uncharted or something.
They sure the fukk ain’t making it?? Why?
And Dragons dogma and DMC sold almost double the copies of bloodborne, and still had trouble getting a sequel greenlit.