The two are not unrelated. As others have noted she did not actually say that she didn't identify as ethnically black (and as you stated we can't be sure whether or not she'd even be wrong to) but qualified it in terms of how she views herself as a model.
Alone, the sentence,
Is pretty reasonable.
She acknowledges what she is but doesn't feel the need to frame her career in such terms, which is fair. Nobody should feel obliged to filter their life/professional experiences exclusively through ambiguous notions of race.
It only becomes an issue when she juxtaposes that notion of blackness with "fair skin" and an "international look" strongly implying that she believes it is unable to adequately represent those things.
I got your point (and didn't even disagree), but as I stated in my first post to you, that is not the issue I commented on, not the the issue I wanted to focus on, nor the issue that I planned to discuss in the thread. That is something you wanted to discuss and focus on and you have that right, but my point is the issue that you wanted to focus on was not the issue that I wanted to.
I don't particularly like discussing "exoticness" "light skin/dark skin politics", and etc on message boards. I commented on the aspect that I wanted to comment on and you are welcome to extend the discussion however you like, but again, I don't really participate in such discussions.