yeah that's the thing people don't realize. police do profile but they also go a lot with their "gut feeling" and stereotype. just based on your body language/what type of person the cop is, his day, etc etc.
one thing i HATE about cops though is that eventhough in the first video i believe the cop was right at least on the principle of it, i also feel like the cop could have defused the whole situation without using force. when the dude asked him for the law that requires him to provide ID, the cop could have tried a little harder to explain that when you commit an infraction you get a ticket. in order to give the ticket the cop needs to identify the guy. and in order to identify, the cop needs ID (i actually re-watched the video and the cop actually tried but he could have tried a little harder.). i still feel like a lot of cops are on some "go ahead, make my day" type steez. like they wish someone would give them a reason to tase them instead of trying to defuse situations. so yeah, cop was right but i wouldn't qualify his intervention as exemplary or professional. professional would have been using psychology and body language to calm down dude and explain the situation to him once his adrenaline is down.
the second video is a very different situation because unlike the black dude, white dude with the gun actually knows his rights. he didn't commit any infractions and was asked for ID eventhough he did nothing illegal. had he just spit on the floor or been smoking a cigarette and disposed of the ash on the floor (anything minor that could warrant a ticket) the cops would have been right and it would have been the same situation as the black dude. the cops backed down cause they knew if that shyt went to court, it's a clear cut case plus video. and the funny thing is, i actually understand the cop's concern in this one (ironically he was probably also stereotyping, he saw a white dude with a gun, he probably fit the other type of profile, lol). but at the end of the day, dude was in his right and knew his stuff.
let this be a lesson to all of us. i'm all for flexing your rights. i've actually been in a couple of situations with cops where cops asked me to do something and i said no. but if you want to do it that way, you better make sure you KNOW your stuff and that they can't make anything stick on you legally. and also, even when i said no, i was always somewhat polite and cordial with them. and in turn they were polite with me as well. there's a difference between being firm and agitated. one can be firm and still polite/cordial and even friendly in some cases. Malcolm X always seemed like the type of dude who knew the law in and out, was firm about making others respect his rights, but also followed the law and was never trying to be too cocky with it.