I hope some of the people in here aren't serious in making minimum wage $50?
If minimum wage was raised then every product in this country would be more expensive and more jobs will go to other countries, I sound like a broken record
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f6e0/7f6e093de317220f82f412483fb1f2f193b9855c" alt="whoa :whoa: :whoa:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/125f6/125f6eff6ba8b2b2cdd7c2f854b677cb49dd1bd0" alt="ohhh :ohhh: :ohhh:"
I hope some of the people in here aren't serious in making minimum wage $50?
If minimum wage was raised then every product in this country would be more expensive and more jobs will go to other countries, I sound like a broken record
it's not even about trying to make everyone win, it's about living in a first world nation and having starving children. Play coy all you want if you can't see there is a disparity of wealth in this country and a pooling of capital into fewer and fewer hands then really there's no point in having this conversation. If you can't see a problem you're sure as fuk not going to recognize a possible solution.The red isnt true, but thats a whole other conversation.
The problem is the policies put into place to help the 99% are in fact hurting them, and increasing the disparity.We need to (brace for cold breeze) stop trying to make everyone win.
Some people are going to lose, its life... and our attempts to reduce the number of people suffering windfall losses has created more losers(figuratively). We need to start making good decisions as a nation, not "feel good" decisions...
Also, let the income brackets go, they are complete bullshyt anyways and only serve to mislead and misinform. Tax bracket receipts from the IRS are better but even they are misleading. Income statistics are snapshots and do not follow flesh and blood people over time, so when people look at them and conclude economic mobility is low, its far from accurate. It also insinuates that the 20% at the bottom during a snap shot in 2010 are the same flesh and blood people in the bottom 20% in 2013. Not saying they cant be or are not, but its not solid enough evidence to parade around as fact.
Secondly income statistics only measure income, not net worth. If lets say... Will Smith took a year off from everything, and made $0, straight up nothing.Using the methods you consider legit, he would be part of the bottom 10% in poverty. Its silly.
Third 90% of income statistics are based on household income, without ever defining household.Are there as many people in a White home, as in a Asian home? how about a Black household? Yet they are compared side by side as if equal at all times... What if you have 10 people in your household all making federal min wage, you would fall into the middle class despite each individual being poor as shyt
Per ca-pita income should be the only acceptable measurement tool.![]()
it's not even about trying to make everyone win, it's about living in a first world nation and having starving children. Play coy all you want if you can't see there is a disparity of wealth in this country and a pooling of capital into fewer and fewer hands then really there's no point in having this conversation. If you can't see a problem you're sure as fuk not going to recognize a possible solution.
What policies in place are actually hurting the poor btw and who put those policies in place?
If the problem in your mind is that we're trying to help to much then you should probably take a step back and really evaluate your thinking.
I agree income isn't the best measure, what it is though is a damn good indicator of a situation. Will smith taking a year off of works doesn't amount to a statistical blip...they only make up 1% of the entire population, for one of them to STOP isn't going to amount for much in terms of people.
You have no data to back anything you're sayingThere are muthafackas who build pallets and wear gloves and work in warehouses driving halo forklifts, working hard... barely making 15 in some places.
Tell this to all the bishes w degrees to work as assistants not making 15 dollars. foh
it has nothing to do with emotion and more to do with humanity. If that makes me "emotional" the so be it. When logic starts to turn on you rway of thinking...i.e. people start up and robbing and killing because they are sick and tired of watching their kids hurt and or they don't have any feasible logical answer then what?"starving children" one of the most potent appeals to emotion in the liberal arsenal
It automatically paints any one not agreeing with you as being anti children and subsequently the "bad guy"
I admire the brilliance and effectiveness of it all.
pushing that aside though, we frankly do help too much.
We distribute so much aid, in such a way, that the overall incentive to work hard is diminished.
It creates a vicious cycle of, people under achieving, bleeding hearts demanding care for them, leading to more underachievers, and more bleeding hearts demanding more care for them, and so on and so on... it never ends.
An example of policies hurting, would be any number of regulations.
Economic mobility is stifled by the yellow tape hindering those at the bottom from entering a market. Chose a market and ill lay out the specifics, but I dont think the point is really debatable.
Monetary cost sure, but that isnt the only form of cost.it has nothing to do with emotion and more to do with humanity. If that makes me "emotional" the so be it. When logic starts to turn on you rway of thinking...i.e. people start up and robbing and killing because they are sick and tired of watching their kids hurt and or they don't have any feasible logical answer then what?
I agree a lot of the programs in question are broken and in need of some overhaul, but that doesn't mean they aren't needed. I've also said the problem runs deeper than a blip on the national budget.
and you want to talk logic? You're complaining about snap and such causing this country to go bankrupt when food stamps only account for what less than 6%...but yeah that 6% is what's gonna break the camel's back.
it has nothing to do with emotion and more to do with humanity. If that makes me "emotional" the so be it. When logic starts to turn on you rway of thinking...i.e. people start up and robbing and killing because they are sick and tired of watching their kids hurt and or they don't have any feasible logical answer then what?
I agree a lot of the programs in question are broken and in need of some overhaul, but that doesn't mean they aren't needed. I've also said the problem runs deeper than a blip on the national budget.
and you want to talk logic? You're complaining about snap and such causing this country to go bankrupt when food stamps only account for what less than 6%...but yeah that 6% is what's gonna break the camel's back.
I believe you're confusing my arguments with the arguments you are accustomed too. I believe welfare is broken. It's not a God send, it has it's flaws, that doesn't mean it's not required. There's a little more nuance that requires less absolute thinking and more practical thinking. NO Welfare isn't the best thing in the world; YES it does have it's purposeMonetary cost sure, but that isnt the only form of cost.
The breakdown of the nuclear family, teenage single mothers, and and entitlement culture, are all cost to subsidizing poor decisions. Obviously the issues begin to spiral out from there, but everyone here is well aware of them, so i'll stop there.
Ask yourself this, has welfare diminished, or uplifted the black community?
If you believe welfare is god sent and has lifted are people up, then... fair enoughwe're seeing things completely different, and thats fine.
I wish you could take off your liberal glasses and see the whole picture... for instance lets take min wage(since its the topic at hand), raising it leaves more young men without jobs standing on the street corner leading to what? Exactly what you see happening if you dont raise wages "
people start up and robbing and killing because they are sick and tired of watching their kids hurt"
I'd rather see young niqqas working for $3/hr learning a business/trade, or at least work ethic... instead of not working at all and turning on their own communities. <---- which is the reality of it, regardless if how great your liberal ideas sound.
First off i'm "Pragmatic" not liberal. Second I can't stand most democratic politicians. Raising the minimum wage is not really even the issue, it's a symptom or rather a treatment for a symptom, as is welfare. And as with welfare just because somethings broken doesn't mean it's not needed.Raising the min wage hurts those who are not employed(of which blacks are disproportionately represented).
Your Democac masters(who never wanted slavery abolished in the first place) couldnt be happier with how things have played out,
simply promising you a bite to eat insures them your vote.
You know, only in America embraces that trickle down theory. No other first world country embraces that free market shyt.