All these things thatpeople say are endemic to hip hop existed before hip hop, and consumers gravitate towards what they want to hear. Is it programming or promoting something to you or giving you something that you can relate to or aspire to or to take your mind off things.... It's all those things, but people will make bad decisions regardless of what type of music they listen to. The people who don't make bad decisions are capable of enjoying music without following it literally or they just listen to different artists period. I don't think hip hop is mostly a bad influence if you're a listener unable to take the good with the bad and appreciate art for what it is, and discern the right messages. Suburbanite black kids listen to the same music, but aside from some posers, don't get involved in the same problems. It's because of what they're around. The person who listened to a rap song and did something stupid would've been persuaded by something else sooner or later. But articles like these also fail to recognize that much of hip hop's influence is in what the artists represent which may entirely different from what their raps may say. What is funny though is that writers have figured out over the last 8 months that if you name drop Jay-Z in a title you can go on whatever tangent or critique you want and it'll get you views regardless of the merit. It reminds of that New Yorker review where the guy said the problem with MCHG was that Jay-Z should've been more offensive to white people and for the Picasso Baby performance he should've put on a black hoody and went around the crowd scaring white people with a fake gun so they could know how it feels to be racially profiled