You're also talking about the president of the United States, the leader of a world super power. Of course that news will travel fastJFK was killed in 63.
You don’t need to have a television in your home to get the breaking information from news broadcast. They simulcast their broadcast across radio as well.
I’m not arguing that people cared about MLK.
The basic fact is the information wouldn’t take months with radio, newspapers, television.
I’m saying that the ability for information to travel fast existed back then.You're also talking about the president of the United States, the leader of a world super power. Of course that news will travel fast
Never said it makes sense. It's just how it is. It doesn't make sense that black people deserve less just bc they're black but if you ask some people it makes perfect sense to them. It's hard to understand something if you don't see the problem, don't care about the problem or don't want to understand the problem.still doesnt mean it makes sense. unless you are going to completely separate, there are no solutions minus white people
Totally correct. My point is everybody in the world didn't care or had the technology like the US had in the 60s. Most had their own issues they cared about a lot more. Look at how long it took the US to learn about most of North Korea's human rights issues. We're still learning new shyt now.I’m saying that the ability for that information to travel fast existed back then.
As many countries that have English/ American connections back then like France, Japan, or West Germany US bases. Yeah it would have spread fast even if it wasn’t front page news.
Yeah Russia probably didn’t report it at all.
obviously it isnt an easy thing.perhaps process of elimination is the only viable optionNever said it makes sense. It's just how it is. It doesn't make sense that black people deserve less just bc they're black but if you ask some people it makes perfect sense to them. It's hard to understand something if you don't see the problem, don't care about the problem or don't want to understand the problem.
We deal with the people that don't see the issue every day. Politicians are known for lying. Kkkops agree with racist. Which white people should we trust to tell our issues that can make a change?
One of the hardest parts is finding who to trust. Another part is trying to figure out how to get EVERYONE to understand. If all the people getting killed and obvious mistreatment isn't enough what will it take for them to finally get it?obviously it isnt an easy thing.perhaps process of elimination is the only viable option
Radios and newspapers still weren’t new technologies and widely available accessed in the 60s. What they reported on isn’t the same as having the information.Totally correct. My point is everybody in the world didn't care or had the technology like the US had in the 60s. Most had their own issues they cared about a lot more. Look at how long it took the US to learn about most of North Korea's human rights issues. We're still learning new shyt now.
therein lies the rubOne of the hardest parts is finding who to trust. Another part is trying to figure out how to get EVERYONE to understand. If all the people getting killed and obvious mistreatment isn't enough what will it take for them to finally get it?
This is just in the UK. Imagine Africa, Australia and other underdeveloped countries.Radios and newspapers still weren’t new technologies and widely available accessed in the 60s. What they reported on isn’t the same as having the information.
Not caring is a whole separate thing which we agree.
East Berlin and other places didn’t care who he was even when alive.
The reason why there is simultaneous global outcry over the death of George Floyd is because we have the fukking internet.
.