Bingo. There's definitely some schizophrenia adjacent stories in the bible
Biblically accurate angels
- Thread starter CouldntBeMeTho
- Start date
fukk it
Deep_Black_Conscious
Superstar
Think in math
Use what we already have, biology(DNA), physics(applied math), psychology(consciosunes+brain connection)+which are all definitions and relation of definitions that comefrom math definition. Anything that is true not true by definition is not proven only demonstrated with a certain number of frequency with the demonstration following assumptions. Since the terms in math are inherently undefined but defined through intuition and represented though waves(sound+color), anything that uses the man will also have definitions that that contain undefind parts including the representations in science which is applied math definitions(variables)+context(variable=this class). The problem is what about the metamathematics and metatheory behind the definition of math in of themselves? That's intuition and imagination.
1) Define methamathematics and metatheory more
2) Come up with new math definitions and explore the implications of Godel''s Theorem of Math
3) Explore the implications of the undefined terms of math in of themselves
4) So we can through 1+2+3 come up with new definitions in both Math and forming new representations in Science, with science being testable and be more open to the INTUITIONS of others which is based on definition for interpretation just like math as we know it right now and applied math everything else that is testable.
Scientists still don't understand the mind body connection and that's why more and more of them are learning to Ontological Mathematics, which goes from the non-extended(dimensionless energy=waves) to the extended (dimensional energy)
But that's only a product of a larger system of representations (metamathematics and therefore definitions=class of objects (from our imagination and memory that comes from?)
Math and Science should be come tools to test definitions that come from our imagination, so we can understand the Math = Methamatheics and Metatheory behind the tautological definitions in the 1st place. An example of this is an entire new derivative of Math being create called different systems of geometry e.g. Euclidean Geometry vs.Non-Euclidean Geometry by redefining the definitions
The constant is operation, magnitude, and multitude, what the number is is not.
But it's simply DIFFERENT definitions of the same thing. That's how math and therefore science works. Math tests its definitions with its own definitions, which contain definitions
that cannot be tested by all the definitions of the system
Those undefined math definitions are defined by intuition itself and the intuitions behind the intuition
Math Definitions are not just definitions, its definitions with an intuition behind them, aka the undefined terms in math leading to Godell's Theorem, which means all thinking, in pure math,
requires some form of intuition+imagination since there will always be undefined objects=classes.
Which means Math is a tool of consistent patterns and science is applied math
Math and Science are tools to test testable perceptions. The next step is expanding the tools and expanding our perception. We already have a good starting point with Physics, Math, all the other fields, THE INTERNET, and of course being able to study DNA via biology and the other 10 "junk" strands of DNA adding up 12.
It's all definition which is directly from our imagination which comes directly from our perception combined by our intuition.
Math+Physics+ New Definitions and importantly Defining NEW INTUITIONS of Imagination
I guarantee you there are good amount of mathematicians, scientists, or people who can think who have intuitions but didn't know how to make them testable beyond assumptions
But that's exactly what math and physics is, defined intuition
behind Math and Physics (Metamathamtics, Metatheory, Something Else?)
This is how math and science can become more creative by creating new representations(paradigms)
Last edited:
thats a lot of thought experiments with no math and no research.
Where is the DNA for us to sequence?
viktordoomsecretwars
Superstar
I don't know if this has already been posted but here is a really good animation of Ezekiel's vision of God and the Cherubim:
Deep_Black_Conscious
Superstar
Your statement shows you don't understand how math=true by definition and applied math=physics, the other testable fields of science work
If you define metamathematics and metatheory more(research what they are), you research the math behind the definitions of math in of themselves, which leads to
1) Truth By Definition = 1 Way to Test a Representation of Things
2) Contingent Truth = What we see in Physics which is applied math with the physics following the RULES THAT THEIR MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATIONS=DEFINITIONS follow
You realize the word proof comes from math? You cannot prove anything outside of math because prove means true by definition, which is how math tests its "experiments" which are thought experiments. Most of my math has been done intutively and then I verifed them via definition by analyzing the definiton=class=object=properties of the intuitions+imagiantion
That is exactly what math is. It just can test itself and we keep seeing it work in reality so
That leads to applied math which leads to physics which leads to applied physics(technology)
Science uses that by applying(representing things in terms of math definition=represetation) these definitions to make their ideas, many of which come to them intuively, testable via measurements, ASSUMPTIONS(required by Godell's Theorem you CANNOT prove an entire math system with the definitions themselves, unless maybe the definitions are defined in terms of math itself e.g. 0=0, the Euler Identify Formula, etc., but that remains to be seen for now)
Since many people lack high math understanding in terms of theoretical math, they focus on the applied math not realizing all the other representations of applied math follow all the mathematical rules of those definitions
Point is the paradigms in math(how definitions are currently represented) and science(math definitions+context to make ideas testable via observation and measurements) shouldn't be the only option, but an option of representing so we can find new ways to think of the same phenomenon, which might have seemed untestable or supernatural but lacked the right representation in terms of math and science. This leads to the problems of paradigms and scientific and even mathematical dogma (debates over if the imaginary number should be used 100s of years ago, I did an entire class doing calculus of complex numbers and imaginary space ironically during my Math degree)
New definitions leading to new representations of relation between definitions =classes=(0, Infinite)Objects of Imagination, the basis of truth as we know it (true by definition, extension of true by definition=uncertain truth)
Truth is just testable intuition represented by definitions = Objective+Subjective Math
We test our intuition with definitions of math or definitions of applied math or
OUR OWN definitions. Definitions is the function for everything else in terms of causility(perceptions of time and defined intuitions)
An intuition might be true but might not have a testable representation yet. That's where definition comes in.
This is why "prove" outside of the context of Math is misused, more like believe based on this defined pattern of consistency and determining the consequences of those patterns via
deductive reasoning(true by definition, and also true by undefined definiton defined by inuition)+inductive reasonig(true by definiton, intuition+level of uncertainty if not Math definition in of itself)
This is also biased towards Intuitive Thinkers. Intuition is reasoning and reasoning starts with intuition and defined intuition = definition
Last edited:
CarbonBraddock
You will be trolled
nikka end up on his knees shivering and crying like Wolverine running up on Proteus talking shyt
negged sir
MaxBundles
Veteran
This is wildly interesting
Where can I get some DMT?Sounds like what nikkas be seeing on DMT.
They always say they can’t describe what they see because words can’t describe it
RareHunter
All Star
My dad said his mom saw one. He said she said it was about 100ft or more tall.
man keep me out this thread…cats got super offended by me obviously fukking around
had no idea brehs was so passionate about seeing angels
Swwwwwwwing loooowman keep me out this thread…cats got super offended by me obviously fukking around
had no idea brehs was so passionate about seeing angels
