U consider late 20s to be a kid?
naw but youve confirmed you were not old enough for the chronic 1 to mean as much to you as it did to me. you were very young when it dropped. which is why youre in this thread talkin nonsense. And to dude quesstioning my name,who gives a shyt
Yeah, I admit I was young when the 1st chronic album came out but ur only a few years older than me so u must have been pretty young urself.
The Chronic will always be superior, I just said both records resemble each other in some ways.
For 2001 a lot of the original crew from the 1st one got together again. Same artists but further a long in their careers and then some new cats as well. A lot of talented people working in one album.
U ain't gotta agree with me but u ain't gonna change MY opinion. That's all.
I don't understand the 'you had to be there' logic with music sometimes.
You're not from america? No need to say im ONLY A COUPLE OF YEARS OLDER if youre gonna keep your age a secret.... U know you wasnt bumpin chronic when it 1st dropped lil homie. I was. Albums sound nothing alike. Nothin only an ignorant person would think so. Thats all
Well, I told u I'm in my late 20s u said ur 32, do the f*cking math. It means ur not that much older than me.
And no, in 92 I was still a kid too busy playing with toys and sh!t but I still heard the album a few years later.
I'm not saying they had the same sound cause they don't have the same sound I'm just saying they were similar. Both great albums and I just felt like they managed to make a great album a second time around.
I guess a lot of u don't get it or understand what I'm tryina say so whatever.
are u from america lil homie?
figures,when did you start listening to hiphop?No I'm not. That doasen't change anything tho.
figures,when did you start listening to hiphop?
guess you'll never know
I don't understand the 'you had to be there' logic with music sometimes.