I don't understand the 'you had to be there' logic with music sometimes.
because sometimes alot of okay chit gets propped up as legendary, while alot of tru legendary chit gets lost in the sauce by outsiders & noobs.
thats one of many reasons why you have to either be there or be schooled by people who were there.
this poll is a shining example.
I'm jumping in the convo now, and I'm not waving the flag hard for either side...but there is absolutely something to be said for "having to be there." Sometimes it's unfair to criticize someone that doesn't like an album by saying, "well you weren't there."
BUT...there is something to be said for being at least of middle school age when Raekwon dropped the Purple Tape, or being in high school when Biggie dropped Life After Death and the Wu dropped Forever. It's no secret the music you listened to when you first got to drive, first got high, first had sex, whatever. That music definitely stays with you. Even into adulthood.
Besides all that, just using Forever as an example, seeing people drawing the Wu symbol everywhere at school and in their notebooks, people getting the album at midnight, that shyt was an event. Chronic 2001 was an event album too. Sure, you can get into those albums later on, but being there was fukking amazing, and it definitely adds to the experience.
EDIT: So yes, I agree it can be an unfair criticism. At the same time, any new head that just heard Illmatic last week and says Illmatic is wack straight up shouldn't have the right to say some stupid shyt like that.
I see what you are saying, but most of that has almost nothing, or very little to do with the actual music you know? It's amazing culturally and it should be remembered, but you can't go home and listen to that regardless of when you listened to the album for the first time you know?I'm jumping in the convo now, and I'm not waving the flag hard for either side...but there is absolutely something to be said for "having to be there." Sometimes it's unfair to criticize someone that doesn't like an album by saying, "well you weren't there."
BUT...there is something to be said for being at least of middle school age when Raekwon dropped the Purple Tape, or being in high school when Biggie dropped Life After Death and the Wu dropped Forever. It's no secret the music you listened to when you first got to drive, first got high, first had sex, whatever. That music definitely stays with you. Even into adulthood.
Besides all that, just using Forever as an example, seeing people drawing the Wu symbol everywhere at school and in their notebooks, people getting the album at midnight, that shyt was an event. Chronic 2001 was an event album too. Sure, you can get into those albums later on, but being there was fukking amazing, and it definitely adds to the experience.
EDIT: So yes, I agree it can be an unfair criticism. At the same time, any new head that just heard Illmatic last week and says Illmatic is wack straight up shouldn't have the right to say some stupid shyt like that.
Well let me explain my perspective here. Whenever a highly anticipated album drops, everyone is excited and those first couple listens are blinded by hype and expectations. Personally I don't care for anyone's first impression of an album, not even myself. There are too many factors influencing your perspective of when you first hear an album that can sway your opinion. I think when you look at an album 10 years later you are album to look at it without any of the prejudice you would have had when you first bought it.
I think that actually contributes to what you just said. Some of the stuff that is remembered today are only remembered because they still sound good to this day, but were otherwise ignored when they dropped. People that prop shyt up a lot of times have never even actually heard the album. This is probably unpopular, but a lot of people prop up The Chronic and I don't think it is THAT good. It's dope, but not fukking with the top tier classics in my opinion
Yep no one was feeling Chronic 2001 when it first dropped.
Typical suburban CAC's rewriting hip hop history again
I see what you are saying, but most of that has almost nothing, or very little to do with the actual music you know? It's amazing culturally and it should be remembered, but you can't go home and listen to that regardless of when you listened to the album for the first time you know?
Let's be clear. 2001 IS a classic off impact and singles. It sold alot and the singles were all classics.
But the album goes MEH status after the 1st half.
Dr. Dre - 2001 (1999) BUY NOW!
Track Lyrics
1 Intro
2 The Watcher
3 fukk You
4 Still D.R.E.
5 Big Ego's
6 Xxplosive
7 What's the Difference
8 Bar One
9 Light Speed
10 Forgot About Dre
11 The Next Episode
12 Let's Get High
13 bytch nikkaz
14 The Car Bomb
15 Murder Ink
16 Ed-ucation
17 Some L.A. nikkaz
18 Pause 4 Porno
19 Housewife
20 Ackrite
21 Bang Bang
22 The Message
Sometimes an artist can conceal the fact that it's only 50% dope songs by sprinkleling the flagship songs evenly. This album has all the best songs at the front and the meh/wack/never talked about songs on the 2nd half.
Did I buy it day1,yea. Did I bump it yea. Do I like it yea. But truth is truth.