B.o.B. says Slave Trade never happened "we found dinosaurs but no slave ships. we were always here"

BoBurnz

Superstar
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
3,499
Reputation
790
Daps
16,169
Time aint got nothing to do with how foolish that is. Yall really think they that powerful to clear out 2 continents full of black people/natives (whichever you want to roll with), then bring over millions more on slave ships and populate the very same 2 continents? Mind you this is AFTER they were getting beat upside the head by the blacks that ruled over them in Europe...

But you rather run with the narratives than what actually happened so go ahead breh. Im leaving that BS alone and any self respecting black would do the same :hubie:
:stopitslime:

Aight, first off, the Spaniards didn't kill off the natives, the shyt the Spaniards brought with them did. Smallpox, measels, viral diseases that before we eradicated (and that's something else you dumb smart nikkas are trying to BRING BACK) killed almost 40% of everybody ever infected, with an estimated 50 Million people infected every single year by the 50's, the natives had 0 immiuno suppresant genes to deal with these viruses, because it developed and originated in the Mediterranean. It killed a sizable chunk of the total population before the cacs even got to Tenochtitlan. Millions of people in less than a few months. Smallpox devastated the natives, everywhere that wasn't Europe not just America. Pacific Islanders were caught in several outbreaks in the 16th-18th century. It almost entirely exterminated the aboriginal's in Australia. When the cacs went to Peru a few years after they almost eradicated the Aztec's, the Inca were caught in an epidemic (some, myself among them, believe it was intentionally caused by the Spaniards), their king died, 30% of their population would die over the next decade.

You asked how so many natives would be quickly killed? That's how, smallpox, massive overwork after they were enslaved, and killed over 70 MILLION native Mesoamerican peoples, it's why the European cac kingdoms bartered with African kingdoms and began the pan-atlantic slave trade, because Smallpox broke out in Africa intermittently but didn't have nearly the same destructive effect as it did to native peoples in the rest of the world. So they were seen as a good back upon which to build their empire and loot all the resources from the islands they were now conquering (they managed to build enough of Mexico with the natives before they died off to establish a baseline rule).

The fall of the Mesoamerican empires is a perfect storm of factors that, had the Spaniards landed simply 1-2 years later, or earlier, may have been entirely avoided as the natives would still be plagued by disease, but could have used their full capacity for war to turn against the limited cac forces.

And no, smart nikka, this isn't from a bunch of cacs, this is all things you can easily corroborate from Neo-Incan peoples (who managed to at least survive as a phenotype, culture, and people for the most part) and the descendants of the various tribes along the Yucatan, because, and this shyt will fukking SHOCK you.

They have historians, too. :ohhh:

Not everything that disagrees with your smart nikka wokeness is a part of the cac white supremacist establishment.
 

eastside313

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
18,299
Reputation
1,055
Daps
36,661
It takes like five minutes of looking shyt up to know we were brought over because cacs thought we were "hardier" because they fukking killed 95% of the natives too. :stopitslime:

shyt bugs me.
Think you know history from a five minute google search brehs
 

Benefited

Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
10,787
Reputation
91
Daps
30,215
SLAVE SHIPS WERE USED FOR OTHER THINGS AFTER SLAVERY BREHS. ANY SHIPS WRECKED NEAR LAND WERE SALVAGED. ANY SHIPS WRECKED AT SEA ARE LOST. GOOD LUCK LOOKING FOR A NEEDLE IN THAT HAYSTACK.

Seems like that would be common sense.

He's right about black people already being here too though I believe. But the majority of us are here by way of slaveship.
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Bushed
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,100
Reputation
-2,418
Daps
16,729
:stopitslime:

Aight, first off, the Spaniards didn't kill off the natives, the shyt the Spaniards brought with them did. Smallpox, measels, viral diseases that before we eradicated (and that's something else you dumb smart nikkas are trying to BRING BACK) killed almost 40% of everybody ever infected, with an estimated 50 Million people infected every single year by the 50's, the natives had 0 immiuno suppresant genes to deal with these viruses, because it developed and originated in the Mediterranean. It killed a sizable chunk of the total population before the cacs even got to Tenochtitlan. Millions of people in less than a few months. Smallpox devastated the natives, everywhere that wasn't Europe not just America. Pacific Islanders were caught in several outbreaks in the 16th-18th century. It almost entirely exterminated the aboriginal's in Australia. When the cacs went to Peru a few years after they almost eradicated the Aztec's, the Inca were caught in an epidemic (some, myself among them, believe it was intentionally caused by the Spaniards), their king died, 30% of their population would die over the next decade.

You asked how so many natives would be quickly killed? That's how, smallpox, massive overwork after they were enslaved, and killed over 70 MILLION native Mesoamerican peoples, it's why the European cac kingdoms bartered with African kingdoms and began the pan-atlantic slave trade, because Smallpox broke out in Africa intermittently but didn't have nearly the same destructive effect as it did to native peoples in the rest of the world. So they were seen as a good back upon which to build their empire and loot all the resources from the islands they were now conquering (they managed to build enough of Mexico with the natives before they died off to establish a baseline rule).


The fall of the Mesoamerican empires is a perfect storm of factors that, had the Spaniards landed simply 1-2 years later, or earlier, may have been entirely avoided as the natives would still be plagued by disease, but could have used their full capacity for war to turn against the limited cac forces.

Yep disease played a part in it. But not to the extent you're making it seem. Disease didnt wipe out the continent of its indigenous people. And even if it did, millions of Africans did not come on slave ships to repopulate the continents. So even if I let that slide, you'd still have to answer for how they were able to bring SO MANY Africans over here. And again, mind you, this was AFTER they had been getting beat up side the head by blacks who ruled over them in Europe for CENTURIES before that.

So the story is that they were getting beat upside the head by blacks, came out of that, and then immediately subjugated the natives here, got rid of them, then brought millions upon millions of AFricans and populated both north and south America
:mjlol:

At the end of the day, how cacs themselves back in the day depicted the people here before them was as black. Not those asian mongloids. How they described them in their writings was as black, not as those asian mongloids. I'll base my opinion on that rather than what cacs of today are saying...
And no, smart nikka, this isn't from a bunch of cacs, this is all things you can easily corroborate from Neo-Incan peoples (who managed to at least survive as a phenotype, culture, and people for the most part) and the descendants of the various tribes along the Yucatan, because, and this shyt will fukking SHOCK you.

They have historians, too. :ohhh:

Not everything that disagrees with your smart nikka wokeness is a part of the cac white supremacist establishment.

They have historians too like the sand cac Egyptians who arent the ancient Egyptians have historians?:ohhh:

Or are the sand cacs in Egypt now also the ancient Egyptians? :ohhh:

:camby:

Its not that everything that disagrees with me is cac shyt. But to purposely ignore the fact that blacks were here before cacs even stepped foot here, to ignore the fact that blacks had ruled Europe for hundreds of years before cacs even stepped foot in America. and to ignore above all that, that even if what you say is 100% true, the people who gave us that narrative dont tell us that there were blacks here before them? Well yea, thats definitely some cac shyt.

Back in the day they said and depicted the people they came across here as black with the same type of hair that blacks have today. Yet now the story has changed and it was the straight haired, asian mongloids that they eradicated? Im supposed to switch up my belief because they decided to switch up on who they saw when they got here? Nah breh. Cant do it. You so called blacks who bind yourselves to cacs and every piece of info they give can do as you please. But as B.o.B. and Waka flocka are showing, people are waking up to the lies they were peddled...
 

Paradise50

Superstar
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
8,097
Reputation
1,310
Daps
27,215
If he was saying that there were blacks already here then I won't argue that. But to flat out say there wasn't an actual slave trade is idiotic. There was but they purposely don't speak on the blacks that were already inhabiting the Americas.
 

RAX 010

NYG LWO METS
Supporter
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
21,014
Reputation
4,833
Daps
42,753
Reppin
EAST✈WEST
Nobody really can prove the full truth but its true that many of us were here before slavery
 
Top