do you feel that non white people are treated fairly in this country?
Nah I've seen it. I've had friends unfairly harassed by the police, the numbers are out there on minorities in prison being incarcerated with little evidence at much higher rates.
It's one of those things I think is more concentrated toward blacks and Hispanics though. From what I recall Asians and Indians actually get loans and those sort of things more often at successful rates than even whites and have different sets of circumstances, so I don't think it's just a minority thing but more a consequence of the status blacks were traditionally put in as "below" white people that has been significantly harder to climb out of.
Do you feel that reperations are due to the decendants of slaves in this country? Why or why not?
There is a question of equality and justice there. As someone who is going into law it's hard to make the argument that someone's children need to be responsible for crimes their ancestors committed, and in my instance my family came to the United States around 1890 from Scotland and was too poor to ever own slaves. Should my family be required to pay reparations despite coming to the country after slavery ended?
If there is a direct link (e.g. my great-grandfather was a slave-owner, the property I've come to acquire was appropriated at the behest of slave labor) then I think there is definite grounds for a claim of that sort that title insurance should cover.
According to Walter Block:
Owning a slave is a crime. The Nuremberg Trials have established the validity of ex post facto law. Those people who owned slaves in the pre-civil war US were guilty of the crime of kidnapping, even though such practices were legal at the time. A part of the value of their plantations was based on the forced labor of blacks. Were justice fully done in 1865, these people would have been incarcerated, and that part of the value of their holdings attributable to slave labor would have been turned over to the ex slaves. Instead, these slave masters kept their freedom, and bequeathed their property to their own children. Their great grandchildren now possess farms which, under a regime of justice, would have never been given to them. Instead, they would have been in the hands of the great grandchildren of slaves. To return these specific lands to those blacks in the present day who can prove their ancestors were forced to work on these plantations is thus to uphold private property rights, not to denigrate them....
I maintain that although reparations are indeed owed to some blacks, from some whites, for slavery, all blacks should not be creditors in this regard, nor all (non-black) taxpayers debtors.
Do you think Jesus's skin color was colored or white?
According to the New Testament there is no definition or reference to what race Jesus is. I'm also atheist, so I don't really care either way. In Europe he appears white, in the Byzantine Empire he was more Turkish/dark looking, in China he appears with Asian features, and in Africa he appears of African descent. I think its more an accessibility-with-one's religion type of thing. "If everyone was created in god's image why is his son a different color than me?" is a tough question to have to sell to your followers. If he was black I wouldn't be surprised, there was some reference to him in the Book Of Judah being from "the dark skinned nation" or something like that.
When you hear about the people starving in Africa, does that move you in any way?
Yeh. I think a large part of the problem is that the countries were set up under colonial rule on nonsensical boundaries with no reference to traditional culture or areas, and the vast majority of African governments are extremely corrupt/borderline communist with the exception of states like Botswana who have done thing the right way and not simply pilfered foreign aid to enrich their ruling class. You have the South African government ignoring AIDS and spending money it doesn't have while running its economy into the ground, everyone knows what happened with Zimbabwe and its massive monetary inflation, etc.
I'd posit the cause of Africa's problems are a combination of the following:
-Colonialism
-Lack of conception / respect / enforcement / protection of individual property rights.
-World Bank Loans that turn countries into debt slaves
-Continued foriegn government "aid", which supports the parasitic class and does nothing for those it is meant to. All it does is sustain the status quo, something I would imagine is part of the goal of foriegn governments "aid" programs. See: US "aid" packages to Pakistan.
-Large foreign businesses getting in bed with the state in exchange for the exploitation of a single natural resource
-States absolutely failing to provide stability, the only function of theirs which should even begin to be seen as legitimate
Africa has extremely low productivity per capita, compared to the rest of the world. Economic theory prescribes that three things are needed for capital formation:
-Strong Property Rights
-Freedom
-Sound Money
Africa has some of the worst protection of property rights in the entire world, some of the most oppressive/useless governments in the world, and some of the worst monetary systems in the world. Botswana, Gabon and Mauritius are examples of how to do things the right way. I think a lot of Africa's problems would be solved if they simply voted in governments that actually represented the people.
But the current situation is definitely disastrous and cause for concern. I think it's something you have to weight on your mind from time to time. I've donated money to fund trips for a few friends to work on aid stuff (habitat construction, garbage cleanup, literacy programs) in South Africa before.