is wrong with you
she’s actively trying to unseat other dems.with the help of parties that aren’t associated with the democratic coalition
Why does she get a pass on that?
is wrong with you
Because those Dems aren’t representing their constituents and don’t want to change shytshe’s actively trying to unseat other dems.
Why does she get a pass on that?
Because those Dems aren’t representing their constituents and don’t want to change shyt
You realize the Dems she’s trying to unseat are in blue districts? Just like AOC knocking off Crowley. Which means a Republican isn’t winning there
Then their constituents should vote them out.Because those Dems aren’t representing their constituents and don’t want to change shyt
You realize the Dems she’s trying to unseat are in blue districts? Just like AOC knocking off Crowley. Which means a Republican isn’t winning there
thats what she is tryna get them to do, innit?Then their constituents should vote them out.
Who’s voting them in?thats what she is tryna get them to do, innit?
She is supporting candidates in those districts that align with her and giving them support.Who’s voting them in?
Seems she's more inclined to push candidates that agree with her worldview than necessarily the constituency as a whole.She is supporting candidates in those districts that align with her and giving them support.
I am not saying it will work, but this also isnt insane.
Of course she will support candidates that align with her worldview. The experiment is to see if there is a sizeable number of voters that support that worldview and will vote for those candidates in significant numbers.Seems she's more inclined to push candidates that agree with her worldview than necessarily the constituency as a whole.
No, the issue is that this is the first time progressives have someone doing it for them. Democratic voters have never been given that choice before. It's not wholesome, it's playing the same game.My only point here is that people cry foul when it's moderates doing it, but frame it as wholesome if it's progressives.
Then don't cry foul when other dems who don't support her worldview don't support her.Of course she will support candidates that align with her worldview. The experiment is to see if there is a sizeable number of voters that support that worldview and will vote for those candidates in significant numbers.
No, the issue is that this is the first time progressives have someone doing it for them. Democratic voters have never been given that choice before. It's not wholesome, it's playing the same game.
I am genuinely confused about what you are saying?Then don't cry foul when other dems who don't support her worldview don't support her.
Then don't cry foul when other dems who don't support her worldview don't support her.
I dont care what she does with her money. Buf if you continue to operate as though you are not a part of the party then don't expect the party to fight for/with you when you want it.I am genuinely confused about what you are saying?
Do you think AOC should give that money to the DCCC?
The DCCC isn't part of the Democratic National Committee.I dont care what she does with her money. Buf if you continue to operate as though you are not a part of the party then don't expect the party to fight for/with you when you want it.
The complaints from the story are:
Only ones crying foul are people that didn't support her, because now she's not supporting them