Then if its so easy to prove, then prove it.
Bruh. People fukk people.
its not that hard to understand.
Homosexuality is NOTHING more than fukking a member of the same gender.
We can get into whether or not "attraction" is a thing, but thats a whole other issue.
Its only chastised in the sense that societies have a concept (not all obviously) that women are the ones that get "fukked" and physically dominated sexually. Thus for a man to enjoy that means he's less of a man...IN THEIR EYES. It doesn't mean anything objectively about human nature.
Its really not that difficult.
There have ALWAYS been gay people.
But when confronted, you like to front like europeans forced that shyt on africans...yet african history ITSELF is so flawed and piecemeal that you're willing to subsitute obvious gaps in that knowledge with pseudoscience from these jackasses who don't know anything about biology, or largely human anthropology.
And miss me with the "white scholars have something to prove" shyt...there are legions of white europeans who have done more for the attempts to discover and draw attention to the plight and history of african peoples in all diversities than most "blacK" scholars have done or tried to do. Not all of them are out to put a dikk in a black mans ass either.
Get over yourself.
Whats amazing to me is that this lecture could apply to white males in the west as well. There just less "manly" shyt to do overall than there was a generation ago. Its becoming harder to define male roles in a society where so much of what we call work and so much of what it takes to provide for oneself or position oneself can be done by both sexes now.
]), but to say male-male or female-female sexual encounters NEVER happened is the HEIGHT of stupidity and the manifestation of naivety.
