DaveyDave
Superstar
have you actually watched the show besides THIS season?
"All BAD Things Must Come to an End" - Breaking Bad Season 5: Part 2 Official Thread (SPOILERS)
- Thread starter bigmac
- Start date
-
- Tags
- breaking bad tv shows
have you actually watched the show besides THIS season?
The fukk is going on in here????
Adam3000
-
DaveyDave
Superstar
there's people being serious with that question in here breh
seriously though, who is todd the gawd
dude is pretty mysterious and has some serious respect for walt. based todd is going to play a pivotal role in the last few episodes.
To the guy who says it's not a plothole. You are wrong. My nikka, I couldn't have a TV show, where I wanted to murder someone who is in Protective custody, and know my life depends on killing this guy in PC. And then skip to the guy dead in PC with 24 hour security and never show how I killed the guy. You people kill me. That is a plothole. You have to show how it was possible Walt poisoned this kid. Jesus. Man.
One of the reasons I bet they didn't show how he poisoned the kid, is because they really didn't know how they could pull off that feat. So they glossed over it, and hoped the audience would just go with it. Which most of you did.
One of the reasons I bet they didn't show how he poisoned the kid, is because they really didn't know how they could pull off that feat. So they glossed over it, and hoped the audience would just go with it. Which most of you did.
It's not a plot hole by the definition of the term plot hole. If you have a problem with it fine, but you can't assign your own personal definition to it and expect people to
And the shyt you're describing isn't the same as what happened. If Gus wound up dead and it was never explained how, that would be comparable to what you're saying. Because that was actually the point of the story arc. That would be a plot hole because Walt and Jesse's entire existence was hinged on Gus's fate.
The kid being poisoned in and of itself wasn't some kind of major on-going story arc. Ergo, how he was poisoned is irrelevant. He could've came down with food poisoning, if Walt stole the ricin at the same time the result would be exactly the same, which is Jesse suspecting foul play, either from Walt or Gus. A plot hole would be if Jesse randomly
and turned against Gus, for no apparent reason. You were given a reason why he turned against Gus.Like I said before, I hope to God you never watch "The Sopranos". They have more open ended, unexplained shyt in 1 season than "BB" does in it's entire run, and nobody ever called them "plot holes".
Fred.
No it is a plot hole. This is something i know about intimately. You can not get a character out of a situation like that, and not show how that happens. Walt's life did hinge on that. If Brock is NOT poisoned, Walt never gets Jesse on his side again and he is as good as dead.
You are now trying to justify your reasoning. Trying to make your point fit what you believe to be a plot hole or not. It is a plot hole. Walt's story arc, and the arc of Gus getting killed is all hinged on Jesse believing Brock is poisoned. Without Brock being poisoned Walt is a dead man. He needed Jesse on his side. Without Brock being poisoned that never happens.
You are now trying to justify your reasoning. Trying to make your point fit what you believe to be a plot hole or not. It is a plot hole. Walt's story arc, and the arc of Gus getting killed is all hinged on Jesse believing Brock is poisoned. Without Brock being poisoned Walt is a dead man. He needed Jesse on his side. Without Brock being poisoned that never happens.
Last edited:
JMurder
SOHH Member since 01...
did the nikka even wipe his ass?OR wash his hands...
You're contradicting yourself.
You said if Brock isn't poisoned....but he was. Your problem isn't that he wasn't poisoned, it's that they didn't show you a step-by-step explanation of how. Which has nothing to do with anything, because we know he was poisoned and Walt orchestrated it.
Do me a favor, go watch "Pine Barrens" from "The Sopranos". I'm sure you'll think that's a "plot hole" too.
Fred.
No, I'm not contradicting myself. You're so obsessed with BB you see no fault in it. In No narrative structure can you graze over such an important plot point and not show it happen. Dog, you're trying to justify the end result of Brock being poisoned, by saying it doesn't matter how it happened. Which is bullshyt in screenwriting. Man you will find an excuse for everything. And quit bringing up The Sopranos. you were the one having a bytchfest because I brought up the Wire when comparing it to BB. Be consistent at least.
Hex by your rational, there was no reason to show how Walt had the 11 inmates killed. They could've just showed the guys dead. Because all that mattered was the result.
Hex by your rational, there was no reason to show how Walt had the 11 inmates killed. They could've just showed the guys dead. Because all that mattered was the result.