Affirmative action amendment has some Asian-Americans furious

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,740
Daps
2,324
Do any of you work at a firm that has Affirmative Action Policies? Because I do. The firm definitely has definitely has lower standards for URMs (Under Represented Minorities). I didn't really believe it until I received a slide deck that showed the firm's recruiting strategy.

URM= Black and latino.

Add to that, the firm has a big "Diversity/inclusive" push, and employees who can show that they contributed to a "inclusive" environment will get rewarded with a better review, which usually leads to a higher raise.


Yet, even with all these policies and incentives, URMs make up probably less than 1-5% of all employees. I have 3 reoccuring teams, and I have helped with maybe dozens of other teams. I am also at the home office about once a month. From what I can tell, the company is about 40% Asian, and 50% white. My teams are mostly Asian. In fact, on my reoccuring teams, there is only one 1 white person per team, and everyone else (including myself) is Asian.


However, I do hear about URMs and their performance through the grapevine, and I never hear anything good. In fact one person was being talked about, and my boss (an Asian woman) said, " she must be some sort of a political hire". All the URMs have that stigma unfortunately. People expect them to fail or need extra help. I can't say anything about myself because I have never worked with URMs before. Interestingly, African immigrants are viewed differently than AA's. I don't think African Immigrants have any sort of stigma.

What's crazy, is that I rarely hear white people say anything about people like that. It's usually east asians that are vocal about their disdain for URMs.


So there is a cost to Affirmative action. Without it, I don't think there would be any URMs at my company besides the very rare URM high achiever, or African Immigrants. However, since lower quatlity people get through using the URM lower standard, they are seen as being incompetent and less trust worthy. You would have to weigh the costs and benefits.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,097
Reputation
14,307
Daps
190,721
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
Do any of you work at a firm that has Affirmative Action Policies? Because I do. The firm definitely has definitely has lower standards for URMs (Under Represented Minorities). I didn't really believe it until I received a slide deck that showed the firm's recruiting strategy.

URM= Black and latino.

Add to that, the firm has a big "Diversity/inclusive" push, and employees who can show that they contributed to a "inclusive" environment will get rewarded with a better review, which usually leads to a higher raise.


Yet, even with all these policies and incentives, URMs make up probably less than 1-5% of all employees. I have 3 reoccuring teams, and I have helped with maybe dozens of other teams. I am also at the home office about once a month. From what I can tell, the company is about 40% Asian, and 50% white. My teams are mostly Asian. In fact, on my reoccuring teams, there is only one 1 white person per team, and everyone else (including myself) is Asian.


However, I do hear about URMs and their performance through the grapevine, and I never hear anything good. In fact one person was being talked about, and my boss (an Asian woman) said, " she must be some sort of a political hire". All the URMs have that stigma unfortunately. People expect them to fail or need extra help. I can't say anything about myself because I have never worked with URMs before. Interestingly, African immigrants are viewed differently than AA's. I don't think African Immigrants have any sort of stigma.

What's crazy, is that I rarely hear white people say anything about people like that. It's usually east asians that are vocal about their disdain for URMs.


So there is a cost to Affirmative action. Without it, I don't think there would be any URMs at my company besides the very rare URM high achiever, or African Immigrants. However, since lower quatlity people get through using the URM lower standard, they are seen as being incompetent and less trust worthy. You would have to weigh the costs and benefits.
482.gif
 

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-430
Daps
5,942
Asians do one thing exceptionally well and that is education but if they continue caking then the evil eye of sauron(white people) will turn upon them and they will be targeted. .
Higher learning ladies and gents.:snoop:
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,223
Damn California is only 7% black.
no offense...

but I researched that percentage.. because I noticed a while ago that some of the black posters from Cali say some of the most fukk shyt. That 7% explains a lot.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,223
Culture is what holds certain groups back in America....... not their skin color.
Yeah that's what's holding them back... but it's only preventing them from getting to the point of fighting against disenfranchisement.

Even after the culture is fixed.. there are still battles to be fought.
 

trollol

All Star
Joined
Sep 20, 2012
Messages
2,216
Reputation
100
Daps
4,667
Reppin
NULL
Tuition should be 100% free for all descendants of slaves. That's it. No more, no less.

welfare and free cell phones... now cheap healthcare at the expense of the rest of the country aint enough for you yet? :mjlol:

"gimme gimme gimme"
 

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-736
Daps
27,702
Reppin
Queens
welfare and free cell phones... now cheap healthcare at the expense of the rest of the country aint enough for you yet? :mjlol:

"gimme gimme gimme"

What? I'm not black and I'm not a supporter of big government in general, but a free education for people who have historically been denied it is only fair.
 
Top