AA goes halfway across the world to tell Egyptian they not real Egyptians

Lionking

Rookie
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
212
Reputation
-840
Daps
358
Why are there no Horners living in large number in N Sudan/S Egypt and why do we not find pyramids and statues in the Horn :jbhmm:
In ancient times the name Ethiopia was primarily used to refer to the modern day nation of Sudan based in the upper Nile valley south of Egypt

:dead:
 

buffruff

Banned
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
451
Reputation
-960
Daps
269
Yet you can't complete a simple task like googling west African empires with a timeline.

You're either a cac or Tommy Sotomayor with crusty nails.
:scust:

I done see the timeline and aint no west african civilization in the B.C part of african history thats mostly north and east africa.
 

Grano-Grano

The Bando
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,685
Reputation
-35
Daps
8,172
Reppin
Skrilla
Why are there no Somalis living in large number near Sudan/Egypt and why do we not find pyramids and statues in the Horn :jbhmm:

Because the ethnic groups of today didn't splinter yet. The language of Karma Culture were a Cushytic language. What does that tell you? I'm not denying the role of Nilotic and other groups of Ancient African however those of EA hold weight brah.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,419
Daps
246,367
Because the ethnic groups of today didn't splinter yet. The language of Karma Culture were a Cushytic language. What does that tell you? I'm not denying the role of Nilotic and other groups of Ancient African however those of EA hold weight brah.

Karma Culture?
 

MalikReloaded

All Star
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
2,449
Reputation
160
Daps
10,744
Reppin
The 215
Would people in this thread be at rest with the idea that Ancient Egyptians looked less like Michael Jordan and more like, Anwar Sadat or the following images
Also, what do posters here think about the genetic studies on modern Egyptians which prove that they are largely descended from the neolithic population of the region?:
4143615894_c30dceb964.jpg

2797643562_2880df3abc.jpg

There are black Egyptians right now still alive to this day in Egypt (southern region).

Those pictures don't tell the entire story. We're talking about 5,000 years (could be A LOT longer) of history. Who lived in North America 5,000 years ago? Exactly. Euros never tell the whole truth. Those people are descendants of the Ancient Egyptians. But they are the descendants that stayed and bred with the Arabs (and Romans, Greeks, Assyrians, Persians). There were other groups of Ancient Egyptians that abandoned Egypt after the multiple waves of invasions. DNA Tribes posted proof of this. Those blood lines spread all across the continent of Africa.
 

pickles

Veteran
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
21,940
Reputation
4,336
Daps
65,332
Reppin
#Byrdgang
The Hamitic hypothesis reached its apogee in the work of C. G. Seligman, who argued in his book The Races of Africa (1930) that:

Apart from relatively late Semitic influence... the civilizations of Africa are the civilizations of the Hamites, its history is the record of these peoples and of their interaction with the two other African stocks, the Negro and the Bushmen, whether this influence was exerted by highly civilized Egyptians or by such wider pastoralists as are represented at the present day by the Beja and Somali... The incoming Hamites were pastoral 'Europeans' – arriving wave after wave – better armed as well as quicker witted than the dark agricultural Negroes."[2][9]

Seligman asserted that the Negro race was essentially static and agricultural, but that the wandering Hamitic "pastoral Caucasians" had introduced most of the advanced features found in central African cultures, including metal working, irrigation and complex social structures


Hamites = horners berbers egyptians

Oh word, your white ass really going to post the Hamitic hypothesis and not expect someone to check you on that?

For your information racist a$$hole, that hypothesis has no basis expect to divide African folk and create the mythology that the darker the skin the more stupid and savage the person is, and the more lighter are more intelligent etc.

How-ever,the article admits difficulties in tracing the history of the most important Hamitic nations-the
Cushytes,the Phoenicians and the Egyptians-due to their great intermixture with foreign peoples.
Thus, the early decades of the nineteenth century greeted a new Hamitic myth, this time with a Caucasoid
protagonist. At the same time the scientific bases of the new Hamitic myth were being devised
and,allegedly,substantiated.
Perhaps because slavery was both still legal and profitable in the United States, and because
it was deemed necessary and right to protect it, there arose an American school of anthropology
which attempted to prove scientifically that the Egyptian was a Caucasian, far removed from the
inferior Negro. As Mannheim said, each intellectual stand is functionally dependent on the
'differentiated social group reality standing behind it.



Page 8.

http://courses.washington.edu/relvi..._in_Christianity_files/Hamitic Hypothesis.pdf

 
Top