here we go again. condense it DOWN, get to the fukking point, because i'm not going to waste another 3 days having these micro arguments with your stupid ass.
If you don't like the length of my posts then stop with the fukk boy shyt. You repeat the same dumb shyt over and over ignoring the facts that refute what you're saying while building straw men. You throw shyt in the discussion then have the nerve to whine when I your break your bullshyt down exposing it.
Your fakkit ass doesn't have to respond either. You can save the bytchmade whining about how I post and just keep it moving.
our tribe is what we make it. no one is forcing blacks to procreate outside the race and claim biracials except other black people (predominately black men). the non-black partners you are trying incorporate into the tribe also do NOT belong, and they certainly dont share the same legacy of slavery.
This is what I'm talking about. The fact that "black" is a term that the white man placed on us refutes everything that you've said here. We didn't make our "tribe". There wasn't a tribe called "black" in Africa. Biracials have always been incorporated in the AA tribe and they most certainly share the history of slavery. We are direct descendants of biracials.
I have to repeat that fact over and over and over because you ignore it in favor of trying to use the same dumb ass talking points. If I didn't have to repeat the same facts over and over my posts wouldn't be half as long.
there is no racial whitening when you centralize blackness around the black woman. racial whitening only occurs when you believe you can procreate outside the race and still produce black.
You have to be able to define "black" first before you talk about "centralizing blackness" you idiot. Again, I've poked holes in your stupid ass personal definition of black and you've got no response. What's your personal criteria for being black? Saying "you have to have 2 black parents to be black" doesn't work.
"Paula Patton and Blake Griffin are both visibly of African descent(so is Halle's daughter),"
even thought these people are half white, you choose to ignore their european ancestry. hell, halle berrys daughter is predominately cac and you still want to claim her too. so wheres the consistency?
Again you cause me to repeat myself yet you have be nerve to whine about the length of my posts.
I haven't ignored anything. Biracial and black have never been mutually exclusive. Being a black person doesn't mean that you can't European ancestry. "Black" is defined as a person who is visibly of African descent. That's as consistent as you're going to get. It's infinitely more consistent than your stupid ass "a black person is someone with 2 black parents" position.
halle berry can create black children but blake griffin and paula patton cant? why is that?
I didn't say this. In fact, I clearly said the opposite. More evidence for why my posts are so long. You're a stupid motherfukker who can't understand plain English. I clearly said that if Paula Patton and Blake Griffin had had offspring with other black people then they're kids would look like other AAs.
if we were still in slavery, wouldn't all 3 children be house slaves?
Halle's kid would but not the other two. If I'm wrong then show one example of a pale skinned blonde haired light eyed slave. Otherwise, you have no point as usual. You haven't got a win yet.
