dora_da_destroyer
Master Baker
This thread is getting too hysterical over the numbers...quite lame as a matter of fact. I'm no fan of overpaying a QB, but it is what it is right now in the NFL - supply and demand.
This thread is getting too hysterical over the numbers...quite lame as a matter of fact. I'm no fan of overpaying a QB, but it is what it is right now in the NFL - supply and demand.
supply/demand is a blanket ass statement reallyThis thread is getting too hysterical over the numbers...quite lame as a matter of fact. I'm no fan of overpaying a QB, but it is what it is right now in the NFL - supply and demand.
the "it is what it is " shyt is KILLING me
Niners front office doesn't have to follow shyt
fukk kaep and his 18m
the "it is what it is " shyt is KILLING me
@JLova kept telling me the 15m+ a year shyt was just a suppostion and I was upset at something that didnt yet happen a few months ago
now "it is what it is" just like when he told me to 'deal with it'
but its never what "it is". its what you make of it. if you have balls and principle you wont overpay even though it might be market price, if you feel value is off. this is how people make money. no one made money by selling and buying at market price.
baseball and basketball are full of terrible ass contracts because gms went with "it is what it is" instead of value shopping. its cowardly gm'ing. 'aw shucks I dont really think hes worth it but since jessica and ashley are getting this much Ill give it to him'. nah fukk that, you gotta be frank underwood or work somewhere else
when it will happen then you might want to look away then. its not finna be pretty on here I will be furious.It still hasn't happened yet and you're still upset. I said back then..Kaep's going to get the going rate. If you want to draft QBs every few years to replace your starter because you don't want to pay him the going rate.... then that's cool. Just understand not everyone agrees with that strategy.
and yet everyone is mostly fine with replacing any other position that way. dolphins traded away b-marsh for peanuts and baltimore traded us quan for a pack of gumJust understand not everyone agrees with that strategy.
if this happens (at this point it will), we'll have basically get behind the 'expand cap each year' wagon. considering we'll have jerreh and arthur blank on it already, its not the worst idea ever. they'll hate their teams getting cash-strapped too. we should have some breathing rooms if we hit on this draft. we'll be saying goodbye to iupati and one of aldon/crabs tho.Just suck it up brehs, he's gonna get at least 18. Hopefully it's structured good enough not to hurt us.
and yet everyone is mostly fine with replacing any other position that way. dolphins traded away b-marsh for peanuts and baltimore traded us quan for a pack of gum
I understand tho, its the holy cow of fapping to qbs under a shrine made out of fusilli and make them out to be saviors when theyre just a brick in the wall.
when it will happen then you might want to look away then. its not finna be pretty on here I will be furious.
not to the tune of 6x times more money. I can buy a WR, two good OLinemen and a corner with this money and still have enough leftover to buy me a hooker that will blow my mind for a few days.QBs are treated differently whether you like it or not. Every sport has a position that gets more shine than others.
quarterbacks dont lead teams to records.I'll only be furious if Kaep doesn't play up to that contract. I'll be even more furious if we trade Kaep and draft a QB that leads us to an 8-8 record and see folk in here complaining about it. Yea, I'll be furious as fukk.
also, I dont get why we need to start a qb we would draft. theres plenty of stopgaps ava for cheap. the same mccown could be had for peanuts. do I trust him ? lolno. he'll cost much less tho and we'll be able to groom a qb behind him.