A 3,300-year-old hairstyle on a preserved ancient Egyptian head

yates

All Star
Joined
May 15, 2015
Messages
1,008
Reputation
735
Daps
5,938
1. Those arent literal depictions and the coloration represents different 'races' as they understood them. White was for 'purity', Black was for fertility/deity and death/the underworld, yellow was the Sun and, to a great extent, people who lived along the Mediterranean, red was the color of chaos and the desert, the opposite of black. The brown color is a mix of yellow, red, black, and green.....


Now, were Sub-Saharan Africans in Ancient Egypt? Of course they were. Was Egypt primarily comprised of Sub-Saharan African people or North African people?

Evidence shows they were North African BEFORE Roman conquest. Let's suppose however, that isn't the case. Suppose Ancient Egypt was 99% Sub-Saharan Nubian, for instance. Why is that no longer the case? You're talking about foreign invaders displacing several tens of millions of people with NO evidence of such migration, and they never took it back.​
Which evidence ? That 2017 study based on 3 mummies ? lol and what is north african in this context ?

Egypt has always been a crossroads for black African and middle eastern peoples. It was never pure black or pure middle eastern. The populations that lived in the south during the predynastic and dynastic period were more "black" which is common sense given its proximity to the African interior. The oldest cemetary in ancient egypt is jebel sahaba which is in the southern part of egypt and the remains morphologically match other black africans. But the population in the north has always been more middle eastern in origin.

And the desertification of the sahara desert would have cut off migration from the african interior where as no natural barrier prevented access from the middle east into egypt which is why it has gotten lighter over such a long period.
 

K.O.N.Y

Superstar
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
10,815
Reputation
2,339
Daps
37,141
Reppin
NEW YORK CITY
1. Those arent literal depictions and the coloration represents different 'races' as they understood them. White was for 'purity', Black was for fertility/deity and death/the underworld, yellow was the Sun and, to a great extent, people who lived along the Mediterranean, red was the color of chaos and the desert, the opposite of black. The brown color is a mix of yellow, red, black, and green.....


Now, were Sub-Saharan Africans in Ancient Egypt? Of course they were. Was Egypt primarily comprised of Sub-Saharan African people or North African people?

Evidence shows they were North African BEFORE Roman conquest. Let's suppose however, that isn't the case. Suppose Ancient Egypt was 99% Sub-Saharan Nubian, for instance. Why is that no longer the case? You're talking about foreign invaders displacing several tens of millions of people with NO evidence of such migration, and they never took it back.​
Yes i understand certain colors had symbolic meanings. That part we are good on

but that artwork is basically a rosetta stone of sorts on how they viewed themselves and other groups. It seems to be a literal depiction rather than a figurative one

the north african berbers and the middle easterners are depicted the same color for a reason. They have a similar appearance. And the egyptians made it known that they were different from that appearance. In that artwork do you think they are showcasing the assyrians and libyans as being pure

It most likely coincided with their actual outward appearances
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
1. That's debatable, nobody can say with certainty how those people looked like.
2. Interesting, do you call out eurocentrism in this forum just as you do afrocentrism?
3.Anybody else can confirm that?
1. They left big sculptures of themselves that show EXACTLY what they looked like.....which look just like the people that live there, right now.

2. See Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, and any Ancient Aliens thread.

3. Here we go......

:sas1:

Look, promoting Black influence in world civilization is one thing, lying about it and stealing others' is another. We don't need to do that. We're better than that.

:sas2:
 
Last edited:

Klaus Schwab

Technocrat AKA Dr. Cocteau
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
470
Reputation
292
Daps
1,931
Reppin
World Economic Forum
1. They left big sculptures of themselves that show EXACTLY what they looked like.....which look just like the people that live there, right now.

2. See Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, and any Ancient Aliens thread.

3. Here we go......

:Sas1:

Look, promoting Black influence in world civilization is one thing, lying about it and stealing others' is another. We don't need to do that. We're better than that.

:Sas1:​
Using your logic Mount Rushmore represents the entirety of the USA. In 100 years people will look at those faces and say 'see that's how all of them looked like'.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Using your logic Mount Rushmore represents the entirety of the USA. In 100 years people will look at those faces and say 'see that's how all of them looked like'.
That argument doesn't work since we have photographs of millions of different people from that same time period in the US.

Not just those 4 sculptures.​
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
248,125
Reputation
30,718
Daps
758,310
Reppin
Top 4
C7-AA8858-0-AD6-49-FF-B993-464740-CC9-A0-A.jpg
I went to the Egyptian museum on Friday

Egyptians were black brehs
 
Top