O.G. Gumpy Johnson
Rookie
Got that gud hair
1. Do you know how each of these groups looked like?1. Olmecs, Aztecs, Powhattan, Iroquois, Nazca, etc.
2. The authors of documents aren't liars because of their ethnicity and ".....centrists' exist in ALL ethnic groups.
3. I have problems with people promoting false ideas under the guise of 'scholarship'. See Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval.
Cacs already cacing in the threadcacs not gonna like this
I get that with the religious depictions and the symbolic depections. But what we're both talking about seemed to just be showing representations of the populations they were interacting withIn Ancient Egypt, colors had meanings we don't ascribe anymore that had NOTHING to do with their actual skin pigmentation.
From magic power to fertility to economic status.
That's why.
1. Their (South/Central American) descendants look just like them and live in the same areas. North American Natives got decimated and acclimated. From populations of tens of millions down to a few hundred thousand.1. Do you know how each of these groups looked like?
2. I agree, you can't paint a brush on people, but let me ask again: What is an "afrocentrist"?
3. Did Ivan Van Sertima promote his book under the guise of 'scholarship'?
Talmahu
the pic in question. So others can view
egyptians in the front, north africans, nilotic nubians and assyrians
I get that with the religious depictions and the symbolic depections. But what we're both talking about seemed to just be showing representations of the populations they were interacting with
yea but how does it apply to the picture aboveA 20th Century comparison would be a "White" American, a Native American 'redskin', and a yellow 'Chinese/Asian' person.
Those depictions aren't about skin coloration as we WELL know, now.
Their depictions were of the SAME nature.
They are symbolic.
And even in this analogy you still land the plane, on a depiction of seperate groups and racesA 20th Century comparison would be a "White" American, a Native American 'redskin', and a yellow 'Chinese/Asian' person.
Those depictions aren't about skin coloration as we WELL know, now.
Their depictions were of the SAME nature.
They are symbolic.
1. That's debatable, nobody can say with certainty how those people looked like.1. Their (South/Central American) descendants look just like them and live in the same areas. North American Natives got decimated and acclimated. From populations of tens of millions down to a few hundred thousand.
2. Afrocentrism is a response to Eurocentrism and just as misguided by presupposing African superiority rather than European in establishing culture and civilization. This is a gross oversimplification.
3. Yes. When it was originally published in the late-70's/early-80's thanks to Toni Morrison, until now......
They Were Not Here Before Columbus: Afrocentricity in the 1990's
They Were Not Here Before Columbus: Afrocentricity in the 1990'swww.academia.edu
yea but how does it apply to the picture above
for instance, what is the symbolism in making both the arab groups white. And the Egyptians making themselves brown
And even in this analogy you still land the plane, on a depiction of seperate groups and races