I'm about to do it especially if I get into my #1 school.Wasting money on a school outside of the top 10-15 in this era is a fools game.
I'm about to do it especially if I get into my #1 school.Wasting money on a school outside of the top 10-15 in this era is a fools game.
Yea I got you its all about what you value. But there are some dudes out there who are about keeping up. The thing about those schools is how many doors they open a Wharton MBA or from HBS opens up doors especially in big cities in industries like investment banking, private equity. The amount of clout that those degrees have is unbelievable even outside the US the dudes that run finance in emerging/frontier markets in Africa, Latin America, Asia are from those schools.
But its about what you value. A lot of people who go to those schools want to be the most important in the most notable metropolis cities in rge world nyc london hong kong etc
I still think you get more value from a top tier European MBA.
Again its about what you value if you want to reach the pinnacle of society in the US. Ivy League education or Stanford MIT other selective nin Ivy schools are the way. From politicd to finance. Robert Smith is a Columbia BS alum. Presidents are ivies, Wall Street execs are ivies, Silicon Valley tyc00ns are Stanford or Ivies, The chairman or woman of the FED i am sure he or she is an ivy leaguer
1. H/W/S - These open large doors. HBS for general management. Wharton for Finance, GSB for Tech. These schools are a class among others. I'd go as far as saying its really HBS then Wharton and GSB, with the latter two interchanging depending on one's long term focus e.g. Finance vs. Tech etc.
2. Rest of the M7 - Put people on the pipeline to rise within the Corporate ladder with high visibility.
3. Rest of the Top 15 - Hedge against future earnings. With a X MBA from one of these schools, you should always make north of $130K long-term in your career. This is like putting a floor on your future earning potential. Also a good way to "tick" the box.
But one thing I think gets drowned out is that MBAs are just a step. The individual still has to put in the work post-MBA. An elite MBA won't get you from A-Z, it might get you from A-G, but that hockey stick growth is up to the individual.
At the end of the day results and end-product are what matters most.
EDIT: Can you explain why you think the European MBA has better value?
I wish...I got a tech huddle to lead today as well as a one on one with my manager...then more testing on data setsAnybody else working but ain't doing shyt this week ?
From work experience, they are more knowledgeable about corporate finance and valuation skills. In addition, it is a one year program where only the essentials are taught, there isn't a lot of fluff in the curriculum.
It's funny you mention this because a colleague of mine echoed the same thing about his Darden MBA experience. The first year was intense for those people looking to get an internship to pivot industries e.g. banking, consulting etc. But once they got the internship and return offer, their 2nd year was pretty much a wash. He said he played a lot of golf, traveled and networked. It was fun, but expensive fun.
I think US undergrads are also quite fluffy. The first 2 years, suffice certain majors, are general courses that don't really have much to do with one's desired field of study. My buddy did Mech Engineering at Howard but it wasn't until his last 2 years that he was taking nothing but engineering courses. No more History or American Literature. It's also interesting because he's doing his Master's in Nuclear Engineering but he's doing much better grade wise because he's simply focusing on what's important and not doing the fluff.
Europe is far ahead of the US as it concerns studying in undergrad. People actually study their major, and do so intensely. It's like undergrad there is akin to a Master's in the US.
I mean, if that's what you're going for. Not everyone is looking to earn that degree for finance, at least I'm not.From work experience, they are more knowledgeable about corporate finance and valuation skills. In addition, it is a one year program where only the essentials are taught, there isn't a lot of fluff in the curriculum.
Not doing a damn thing.Anybody else working but ain't doing shyt this week ?
I mean, if that's what you're going for. Not everyone is looking to earn that degree for finance, at least I'm not.
I got you when I get home.anyone got the professor messer course notes for sec 501 for the free