Mike Nasty
Superstar
There were also parts of his "confession" that didn't match the crime scene, I noticed you left that part out.Reasonable response. Respect bro I don't disagree with you here.
There were also parts of his "confession" that didn't match the crime scene, I noticed you left that part out.Reasonable response. Respect bro I don't disagree with you here.
They're infiltrating, invading and buying up Brooklyn enough as it is - don't give that white boy any ideas..wikipedia
If you think that's just a coincidence, I own a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in...
Nah I didn't leave the part out. I also said evidence outside of his confession points him to being the killer.There were also parts of his "confession" that didn't match the crime scene, I noticed you left that part out.
For Steven Avery because the blood evidence was so fugazi they actually said they found his "sweat DNA" on the hood of the car...There's supposed evidence linking him to the crime, but then there's also evidence that he didnt even know what the fukk he was talking about during his confession.
He confessed but the confession didnt match the actual murder. They had to do a second confession because dude didnt even know the girl was strangled to death.
As for the DNA evidence, it is kinda strange that they are just referring to it as DNA when usually they state where the DNA was found. Reminds me of that Steven avery case where they said they found his dna in the car but upon further inspection, the DNA seemed to be planted. I dont put shyt pass cops.
The hospital visit the next day is pretty damning but I'm still not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that this man killed that girl.
If they cant prove beyond a reasonable doubt, then they need to free this man.
Doing all this complaining yet you're still responding and you've been a white poster here since for the past 7 yrs and in the red, shocker... . No one is forcing you to comment, u dumb fukkin cac. Keep posting up racially disguised insults but you're still white trying to pop shyt, with no real cause for defense and that white girl is still dead- with all evidence pointing to the fact that a black man has nothing to do with it .. what's your point??oh, you must be one of those who liked it around here, back in the day when you could feel comfortable cackling and free enough to roam about in black discussions and say what you want without being opposed or challenged on your racist ideologies.Once again you proved my point about you Coli weirdos. Out of all that you typed none of has to do with this discussion.
I REALLY would love to know what intelligence level your mind has to be at to type some weird irrelevant sh&t like that. I'm serious!
More power to you dog lol. Keep up the good coherent rational discussions lol
From what I'm reading, there were lacerations consistent with rape but no DNA evidence. Even if someone wore a condom, there would still be some type of DNA from skin cells or hair follicles.He told me it look like somebody killed her and stripped her clothes to pose her like a whore...This explains why there is zero evidence that she was raped...
4 jurors committed misconduct in Karina Vetrano trial: defense
By Shari Logan and Emily Saul
April 18, 2019 | 7:29pm
Enlarge
More On:
karina vetrano
Sentencing for Karina Vetrano's killer postponed
Karina Vetrano's father in good spirits before killer's sentencing
Mom of Karina Vetrano killer Chanel Lewis: My son was set up
Queens jogger Karina Vetrano's parents thank jurors for conviction
Lawyers for Karina Vetrano’s convicted killer claim that at least four jurors on the panel that found him guilty in the jogger’s 2016 slaying committed misconduct, new court documents show.
The motions by Chanel Lewis’ defense team allege two jurors talked about the case before deliberations kicked off — despite warnings from the judge not to do so.
One of those jurors is also accused by the defense of ripping up someone’s request to hear evidence because the panelist didn’t want to stay late.
Yet another female juror told a male panelist to shut up after he questioned whether Lewis had raped Vetrano because there was no vaginal DNA evidence. The female juror said she herself was a rape victim and knew more about sexual assault than he did.
Finally, another panelist tried to draw comparisons between this case and a rape trial she’d sat on in The Bronx, defense attorneys said.
The jury found Lewis guilty of Vetrano’s killing April 1, following five hours of deliberation.
Ventrano, 30, was found strangled with her pants pulled down in a marshy area near her Howard Beach home. Lewis initially confessed but later recanted.
The filings, which led Lewis’ sentencing to be rescheduled Wednesday, seek to overturn the verdict as they recount the jurors’ alleged misdeeds.
The documents claim that two panelists improperly talked about their feeling on the case before deliberations.
“Specifically, JUROR B stated to JUROR A, ‘well, I have my mind made up, and I hope you do too’ after the victim’s parents testified,” reads one motion.
The filing also claims that when the juror who was a rape victim told another panelist to shut up, that wrongly led to discussions about the jurors’ personal DNA knowledge.
“JUROR D improperly supplemented the evidence presented at trial with her own personal experience in such a way that led others to feel they could not challenge her and had to take her at her word,” the papers say.
Lewis’s lawyers claim yet another juror, who previously served in The Bronx on a rape trial, also tried to insert her own expertise and draw parallels between the two cases.
Prosecutors filed their own set of motions refuting the allegations — including saying the same woman identified in defense papers as Juror D denied ever saying or hearing a similar statement.
The parties are due back in court Monday for hearings on the motions.
There's multiple threads on this and rather than bump them all, I'll just @ everyone who posted/dapped in them.
Truth be toled, the bolded occurs far more often than not in these types of cases here in NYC.
I know of a case recently where something similar occurred with jurors wanting to bring deliberations to an end fairly quickly so they could go on with their lives and we’re tired of serving on jury duty. Of course the defendant was black and the plaintiff white.
I always SMH at brehs who don’t serve on jury duty or take it seriously but want to scream “free so and so”!
Because cops have really interesting ways of getting info out of you. They can get you to tell a lie just by asking the same question twice with minor changes in the question that lead you to give a different answer or a “lie”. The boy isn’t playing with a full deck so I can see them tricking him into admitting to it.Wait, why did breh confess then redact his confession? Was he coerced into confessing, or is dude not all there?
And aren't the lawyers supposed to weed out any potential biased people during jury selection?? How do you let a woman who was raped be a juror in this case? Dude wasn't going to get any justice with these jurors already having their minds made up.
Being a thot that's heavy into the club scene isnt enough to for me to believe she was selling p*ssy. Half of all women must be selling p*ssy cuz countless women are thots.
I feel like this has something to do with her father, definitely a hit.
Its ridiculous...The whole jury system is fukked up. Imagine you got falsely accused of a crime and you know you're about to be judged by a jury of your PEERS....... 12 people who just wanna get the whole shyt over with cause they need to work. I love my family but there's only a handful of these muthafukkers I would give that type of responsibility. I might even have to look at my mom funny.....like I don't know, she kind of on the feminist tip........most people are out here living with legit mental issues. Can't just let any person over 18 hold power over a man's life like that. shyt is ridiculous.