4 jurors committed misconduct in Karina Vetrano trial Chanel Lewis Sentenced to Life/ No Parole

[the next guy]

What a shame. Really.

 

[The Fukin Prophecy]

First I remember reading that info in the police report a year or so ago. Just now I couldn't find direct receipts other than the wikipedia entry for the trial where it states

"His mother recalled that upon returning home that night, he looking "disheveled" with his clothes torn. Lewis claimed he had been mugged by a group of men, although there was no evidence of such an attack, and a police report was never filed. The next day, August 3, Lewis's father, a former school principal, took him to a local emergency room for treatment of scratches and cuts on Lewis's upper body."

Secondly to your question about skin and blood. That is usually what they mean by DNA, what do you think they test the skin and blood for?

Again am I saying he 1000% did it, NO! But the evidence points a heck of a case.

But yall sitting here acting like yall definitively know that he DIDN't do and conjuring up a bunch of wild fake woke theories.

When ya'll know got DAMN well if the victim was black and a white mentally ill dude CONFESSED and DNA evidence pointed to him.

That would be 1000% enough for yall to convict him. But whats different here? Oh Yeah RACE. Thats it! Admit I'm RIGHT!

wikipedia

Why don't you just go get your info from her mother and post it here while you're at it bruh...

The point about the DNA is they never said they found SKIN CELLS, they were very ambiguous in stating DNA was found...

If she scratched dude up like you believe she did in that story you posted they would have 100000% found SKIN CELLS

The DNA they claimed to have found is equivalent to that of swabbing someones mouth with a cotton swab which is what they did to Chanel Lewis...

If you think that's just a coincidence, I own a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in...

 

[y2flyy]

Btw DNA was collected from 360 black men. Why? Why the fukk would they assume it was a black suspect off the rip?

"But defense lawyers for the man charged in the killing, Chanel Lewis, are now contending that the police swept up hundreds of black men in a “race-biased dragnet” before settling on him — information they argue should have been turned over to them before trial. They said they learned only recently that the police took DNA samples from at least 360 black men who had been previously taken into custody in parts of Queens and Brooklyn.

Six months after taking the DNA samples, investigators testified that they finally found a match in Mr. Lewis, whom detectives approached on a police lieutenant’s intuition. Mr. Lewis, now 22, confessed to the crime, though he later claimed he was coerced."

Lieutenants intuition? Man if they dont get the fukk outta here with this bullshyt!

Ok go ahead and use the defense lawyer's claims as 100% proof as his innocence. Oh because defense attorney's never try any strategy to bring doubt against their's clients guilt. So reports were a lot of DNA samples were analysed. How do we know all of them were of black men?

Also you're being incomplete, just saying it was a Lieutenants intuition. The cop had followed Lewis for several days after witness reporting a strange man walking around with a crowbar. And pacing a parking lot with sweatpants and a hoodie on in the middle of summer. So the cop stopped him.

He confessed.

Again is this 100% his guilt. No. But geez to proclaim this brother is innocent and we have the evidence we do. is 1000% based solely on him being black and the victim being white.
Tell me I'm lying.

Tell me yall would be just as vigilant and outraged at the accusations if the perpetrator was white and the victim was black. Tell me I'm lying.

 

[Aintnobodystupid]

Secondly to your question about skin and blood. That is usually what they mean by DNA, what do you think they test the skin and blood for?

Again am I saying he 1000% did it, NO! But the evidence points to a heck of a case.

But yall sitting here acting like yall definitively know that he DIDN't do and conjuring up

When ya'll know got DAMN well if the victim was black and a white mentally ill dude CONFESSED and DNA evidence pointed to him.

That would be 1000% enough for yall to convict him. But whats different here? Oh Yeah RACE. Thats it! Admit I'm RIGHT!

I'm going to look into the hospital visit further but his parents and family still defended him afterwards so they dont believe he got those injuries from her. If she was scratching him I'd imagine she'd have skin and blood from him under her nails and on her hands and arms. That alone would have made the case clear he was the culprit. The fact of a mistrial and now jury misconduct tells me that it's not skin and blood but something that could've been planted and that's why they are having a hard time deliberating time.

We aren't vindictive like that. Since we've been railroaded enough with the races we're reversed there'd be people questioning whether the white party actually did it or not in the same circumstances. Wed want the actual perpatraitor off the streets not just anyone to give the victims family closure despite reasonable doubt.

 

[5n0man]

take the fukkin cape off and do some research, so she's white and therefore not a candidate for selling ass?? and if half of all women are thots, then half of the men buying ass are complicit to that shyt. The mob is heavy in the prostitution and escort game, foh. Instagram is modern day e-prostitution, if they're advertising it then someone is buying. Not all women are on IG and not all are attention whoring thots, not the self-respecting types anyway.
"With provocative photos of Karina from her Instagram account all over the front pages of the New York Post and Daily News, along with explicit excerpts from her blog about her sex life and flirtation with the “dark side,”

You are constantly the angriest person on this site for no reason.



What does her being white have to do with anything I said?

I dont know shyt about this girl, I simply stated that being a thot and going to clubs is not enough information for me to assume that she was selling p*ssy and was murdered for it. If thats the case then there are countless women you can assume is escorting.


The information in this situation leads me to believe that the girl was killed over something her family was involved in.

 

[Houston911]

She def was selling p*ssy.

Is this confirmed?

This case don’t add up

 

[y2flyy]

SHUT THE ENTIRE FUK UP, you whole useless fukkin cac - sick of yall and your pandering, race baiting rants and generalizations. You must be Juror D. white girl got murked by one of yall, that park has bodies on top of bodies in it going back to the 1930s, along with the area being heavily populated with Gambino and Bonnana mob ties. How about you analyze the information for what it is- if you really want to get technical, black people are not out here killing white people like that. Check the stats - there are more whites killing whites, blacks killing blacks and Hispanics on Hispanics - it's called intra-racial crime statistics and research. I swear to god, I wish I was a criminal defense lawyer or prosecutor- I would hem up your white asses so fast..

As usual you coli weirdos type a bunch of nonsense that's not even relevant to this specific case. And just name call and fake outrage.
1930s, bodies, mobs, blacks don't kills whites like this?

Oh ok gotcha. According to coli weirdo #0416. Its impossible that a black man killed a white woman. It has NEVER happened....Gotcha dog!

 

[y2flyy]

I'm going to look into the hospital visit further but his parents and family still defended him afterwards so they dont believe he got those injuries from her. If she was scratching him I'd imagine she'd have skin and blood from him under her nails and on her hands and arms. That alone would have made the case clear he was the culprit. The fact of a mistrial and now jury misconduct tells me that it's not skin and blood but something that could've been planted and that's why they are having a hard time deliberating time.

We aren't vindictive like that. Since we've been railroaded enough with the races we're reversed there'd be people questioning whether the white party actually did it or not in the same circumstances. Wed want the actual perpatraitor off the streets not just anyone to give the victims family closure despite reasonable doubt.

I respect your response dog. But parents defending their accused child is nothing to even point at. Parents will d*mn near defend a serial killer with video evidence if that was their son. Cmon dog.

Secondly I completely disagree with your last sentence. I want you to show me ONE thread in the coli history that defends a charged white person and the victim was black? Especially one where the suspect CONFESSED and DNA evidence points them to the crime. One thread bro show me one thread.

Lastly again my points are not to say this dude is 100% guilty. I believe he is or more likely guilty based on the evidence.

My larger point is the craziness and hypocrisy and fake outage yall be on.

 

[5n0man]

First I remember reading that info in the police report a year or so ago. Just now I couldn't find direct receipts other than the wikipedia entry for the trial where it states

"His mother recalled that upon returning home that night, he looking "disheveled" with his clothes torn. Lewis claimed he had been mugged by a group of men, although there was no evidence of such an attack, and a police report was never filed. The next day, August 3, Lewis's father, a former school principal, took him to a local emergency room for treatment of scratches and cuts on Lewis's upper body."

Secondly to your question about skin and blood. That is usually what they mean by DNA, what do you think they test the skin and blood for?

Again am I saying he 1000% did it, NO! But the evidence points a heck of a case.

But yall sitting here acting like yall definitively know that he DIDN't do and conjuring up a bunch of wild fake woke theories.

When ya'll know got DAMN well if the victim was black and a white mentally ill dude CONFESSED and DNA evidence pointed to him.

That would be 1000% enough for yall to convict him. But whats different here? Oh Yeah RACE. Thats it! Admit I'm RIGHT!

There's supposed evidence linking him to the crime, but then there's also evidence that he didnt even know what the fukk he was talking about during his confession.
He confessed but the confession didnt match the actual murder. They had to do a second confession because dude didnt even know the girl was strangled to death.

As for the DNA evidence, it is kinda strange that they are just referring to it as DNA when usually they state where the DNA was found. Reminds me of that Steven avery case where they said they found his dna in the car but upon further inspection, the DNA seemed to be planted. I dont put shyt pass cops.

The hospital visit the next day is pretty damning but I'm still not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that this man killed that girl.

If they cant prove beyond a reasonable doubt, then they need to free this man.

 

[the next guy]

I loveee how EVERYTHING is race based with yall. If the races were reversed and the accused was a white man in a killing of a BW (with the SAME exact evidence).
Ya'll would be shouting for this same "justice" system to convict him. But since in this case, its a brother so you all want shout this fake woke crap about another Central park 5,

Yeah let's forget that Lewis's mother even said that he got home THAT SAME NIGHT, with torn clothes and scratches all of him (after he admits to being in park around that time). So much so they took him to the hospital the next day. Yeah suspect, well damn how so?? Must be because he black right?

Yeah lets forget the DNA evidence under the victim's fingerprints, that matches Lewis. Yeah all setup by the white supremist justice system right?
Oh but didn't he confess? And he only wanted to confess to a black officer? Ohh but yeah i forgot, how could he be a suspect. Only because he black right?

I swear yall are grade A weirdos and base every conclusion on situations like this solely on RACE.

Admit it for once. If the victim was black this thread wouldn't look like this. Admit it for once that yall full of fake woke nonsense and could care less about facts or a preponderance of evidence.

Not sure I agree with this. The fact with we jury misconduct to this level make the case unique among others.

 

[5n0man]

I always felt it was odd that he knew exactly where to go to find her body.

I didnt even know the dad led the cops right to her body and then contaminated the crime scene.




I see what's happening here.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

As usual you coli weirdos type a bunch of nonsense that's not even relevant to this specific case. And just name call and fake outrage.
1930s, bodies, mobs, blacks don't kills whites like this?

Oh ok gotcha. According to coli weirdo #0416. Its impossible that a black man killed a white woman. It has NEVER happened....Gotcha dog!

I'm not your dog, you white faggit. of course, you would say "dog" - just like the ones that you fukk..yall are weird as shyt for being in relationships with animals, treating your dogs like lovers. do something useful - tell youru people to take their dogs and keep them off black college campuses.

yall are mad as shyt this turn of events is happening in his case and more of these racist tactics are getting exposed can't even respond with a rational explanation or a factual manner to support your claim, stupid fuk. That shift is happening white boy..

 

[The Fukin Prophecy]

Ok go ahead and use the defense lawyer's claims as 100% proof as his innocence. Oh because defense attorney's never try any strategy to bring doubt against their's clients guilt. So reports were a lot of DNA samples were analysed. How do we know all of them were of black men?

Also you're being incomplete, just saying it was a Lieutenants intuition. The cop had followed Lewis for several days after witness reporting a strange man walking around with a crowbar. And pacing a parking lot with sweatpants and a hoodie on in the middle of summer. So the cop stopped him.

He confessed.

Again is this 100% his guilt. No. But geez to proclaim this brother is innocent and we have the evidence we do. is 1000% based solely on him being black and the victim being white.
Tell me I'm lying.

Tell me yall would be just as vigilant and outraged at the accusations if the perpetrator was white and the victim was black. Tell me I'm lying.

He was followed and reported because someone saw a BLACK man in Howard Beach...

All that other shyt you posted is nonsense...

There is no physical evidence that ties Chanel Lewis to this case whatsoever outside of this ambiguous DNA that is NOT SKIN CELLS...

But keep telling yourself that there is son, you clearly have some kind of save a pawg agenda here...

 

[y2flyy]

There's supposed evidence linking him to the crime, but then there's also evidence that he didnt even know what the fukk he was talking about during his confession.
He confessed but the confession didnt match the actual murder. They had to do a second confession because dude didnt even know the girl was strangled to death.

As for the DNA evidence, it is kinda strange that they are just referring to it as DNA when usually they state where the DNA was found. Reminds me of that Steven avery case where they said they found his dna in the car but upon further inspection, the DNA seemed to be planted. I dont put shyt pass cops.

The hospital visit the next day is pretty damning but I'm still not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that this man killed that girl.

If they cant prove beyond a reasonable doubt, then they need to free this man.

Reasonable response. Respect bro I don't disagree with you here.

 

[tremonthustler1]

The case being so damn expedited is crazy. You know how hard it is to find 12 oblivious people to do a murder case at $40 a day?

I had to do a DUI case in the BX and I wanted to die when they told me it was a week.

When the spotlight winds up on him, it’s gonna expose that whole family and neighborhood.

In the meantime, news companies can’t wait to go back to posting all her pics on the news

 

[y2flyy]

I'm not your dog, you white faggit. of course, you would say "dog" - just like the ones that you fukk..yall are weird as shyt for being in relationships with animals, treating your dogs like lovers. take your dogs and keep them off black college campuses.

yall are mad as shyt this turn of events is happening in his case and more of this racist shyt is getting exposed can't even respond with a rational explanation or a factual manner to support your claim, stupid fuk. That shift is happening...

Once again you proved my point about you Coli weirdos. Out of all that you typed none of has to do with this discussion.
I REALLY would love to know what intelligence level your mind has to be at to type some weird irrelevant sh&t like that. I'm serious!

More power to you dog lol. Keep up the good coherent rational discussions lol