Elle Driver
Veteran
My baby MBJ doin big thangs.
@Kill Dat Noize got some of the most backwards opinions i done seen in awhile
Brehs really trying to say that Superman is more popular than Batman, Spider-Man or Iron Man in 2014
There's a difference between being famous and popular, Superman is undoubtedly the most well known/recognisable "superhero" in the world, however in terms of Popularity, the character is far far behind the likes of Spider-Man, Batman, Iron Man and Hulk.
aint no body give a fukk about superhoe..
superman the biggest over powered fakkit in the DC universe (minus Injustice & Earth 2)
Batman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
they're two osborns in this movie and they have to take time to introduce both of them.Disagree breh, disagree. It's got three, but one main and Chris Nolan showed its possible to pull off multiple villains if you write them and connect them correctly. Electro exists because of Oscorp, Rhino is barely in it, and Goblin is connected to Electro. So it's not like Batman and Robin or Spider man 3 when you just toss villains together with no rhyme or reason. If you come up with a logical way for them to be connected in the story, then it works. Batman Begins had Falcone, Scarecrow and Ra's. Dark Knight had Maronie,(sic), Joker, and Two-Face and in both cases, they were all connected in one way or another and not just thrown together. It's a lazy criticism to throw at the movie without seeing any of it in action.
Let me ask you a question who do you think would win in a fight Batman or Superman.
One word answer.
PREP TIME.... MOTHERfukkER
And you have what evidence to support that.
they're two osborns in this movie and they have to take time to introduce both of them.
plus i can tell from the electro trailers that he has a backstory in the movie too.
if rhino is barely in it they should have just left him out completely.
Plus they still have to go into the plot with his parents.
then they're still gonna have to address his relationships.
too convoluted
I don't have a problem if someone decides to play a character differently.
If this is a "different" interpretation of Spidey then so be it. I'm cool wit it.
I'm just sayin I don't buy this kid's performance. I don't buy his conviction.
As for the movie itself to me it just looks off. Like when you look at Jamie Foxx's character and you look at the way he plays it... and then you stack it up against how Andrew Garfield looks to be playing Spiderman... there's something tonally different in the way they're portraying their characters. Like they don't belong in the same movie.
Garfield comes off as that more earthy and more "real" Spiderman and yet in this movie it looks like he's goin up against a villain who looks and acts like he came out of a children's comic. It's like if they woulda put Christian Bale's Batman against Jim Carrey's Riddler although not as severe.
Brehs really trying to say that Superman is more popular than Batman, Spider-Man or Iron Man in 2014
There's a difference between being famous and popular, Superman is undoubtedly the most well known/recognisable "superhero" in the world, however in terms of Popularity, the character is far far behind the likes of Spider-Man, Batman, Iron Man and Hulk.