☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,345
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
617,853
Reppin
The Deep State
I have yet to see actual compelling evidence coming from the "they came before columbus" crowd

And the logic funding it has been :patrice::snoop: so far

Very dangerous to spread misinformation of this sort
its basically kinda insulting to natives that WERE here...they never have an answer for those people
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,345
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
617,853
Reppin
The Deep State
But you’re denying that there’s people in power suppressing the fact that there were dark skinned Indians who looked like negroes. According to the murals themselves and what the author I quoted wrote.

Not only there but in Europe. It’s not a straw man. It’s the fact that the fiat people on every continent were people of color.
There are also murals in China of dark skinned people but again you keep ducking the suppression of history for your goofy duck duck goose games instead of addressing what’s said...

you basically killed your argument
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
20,198
Reputation
635
Daps
81,862
I'm not the one denying established evidence based arcaeology, genetics, linguistics and so forth.
Keep bringing up strawmen about the moors when that's not what's being discussed.

I'd rather listen and take the word of established historians and other people in different fields of study than listen to a moron that thinks a mural is 100% proof of their assertions.

In the mean time:
Amerindians with dreadlocks
1e7e56e370aea63f2662c1a27691233c.jpg


Must be black too, right!? :troll:
Homie in the bottom right look like LeBron James dead on so it’s ironic that you chose that smilie :lolbron:
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
6,526
Reputation
703
Daps
16,331
But you’re denying that there’s people in power suppressing the fact that there were dark skinned Indians who looked like negroes. According to the murals themselves and what the author I quoted wrote.

Not only there but in Europe. It’s not a straw man. It’s the fact that the fiat people on every continent were people of color.
There are also murals in China of dark skinned people but again you keep ducking the suppression of history for your goofy duck duck goose games instead of addressing what’s said...
At the bolded part - You have literally destroyed your own argument.

Once again, I'll leave this here:

Dark skinned Amerindians with dreads
1e7e56e370aea63f2662c1a27691233c.jpg

Being that you think a picture can prove your point. I think this also proves my point.
 

Dion Isus

Pro
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
347
Reputation
-210
Daps
793
I've said this plenty of times. There's a history grand strategy game called Europa Universalis 4. You start in the 14th century and can pick any nation around at that time. I always pick Mali cuz they are the richest in Africa at the time , among other reasons.

It clearly states that Abu Bakr II led a naval expedition to find the new world. It's actually an objective playing as Mali . I dont think they would lie on a video game that's about history .

Its more likely that if he was sailing anywhere, it was up and down the Niger River. West Africans never developed ocean crossing technology.
 
Last edited:

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
Absolutely. I know black people were here before. I quoted the wrong post.Pardon me...

But between the Bonampak murals, the description of the natives Verrazano saw, ,and the fact that when they disguised themselves as Indians during the Boston Tea Party they painted their faces with soot.....

I think its quite obvious the Indians were "black" in complexion.

Now lets figure out if they had contact with "Africans" or some other group is what Im trying to confirm..

Ok got it. Christo Colombo brought a moor with him (Luis de Torres) and you can see moors in the back of certain George Washington photos so yea I think its more likely that Africans came here before Euros than the other way around..
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
At the bolded part - You have literally destroyed your own argument.

Once again, I'll leave this here:

Until you address cacs suppressing the people who said Indians were black, Im not destroying my argument. Showing someone with dreads doesnt mean anything UNLESS you're saying that these Indians resemble the murals more than black people do. You wont address that though just as you wont address cacs suppressing black history WORLDWIDE....

Heres more black Indians:

24f2c6654e1d2e3db9d09dd62dcdae01.jpg
''

You'll have more excuses, but you wont have any reasons as to why this type of information is suppressed when it comes to the public educational system.
:coffee:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880


:russell:

If they came to America what would they be called? Black right? :sas1:

The point is breh, that all American history isnt being laid on the table. Growing up not once was I shown a picture of a black looking Indian. Never was I told that there were explorers/authors/painters that depicted the people they met as black. Not once was I told that John Smith said Powhatan (the father of Pocahontas) was black. Not one single time was any of this VERIFIABLE information presented to me in the public education system. So WHOEVER you want to say they are, FIRST you have to address the suppression of this history. Which yall refuse to do.

Why? Because you're agents here to stir conversations one way or another. You're not here to have any type of honest discourse because if you were, you would have addressed the SUPPRESSION of the things I've mentioned... Instead yall keep playing duck duck goose
:unimpressed:
 
Top