The Stan Titan
Rookie
That solves it.
The people depicted were "black" but not African.
Case closed.
That solves it.
Ah the typical, 'It's okay when I use it' argument.Until you address cacs suppressing the people who said Indians were black, Im not destroying my argument. Showing someone with dreads doesnt mean anything UNLESS you're saying that these Indians resemble the murals more than black people do. You wont address that though just as you wont address cacs suppressing black history WORLDWIDE....
Heres more black Indians:
''
You'll have more excuses, but you wont have any reasons as to why this type of information is suppressed when it comes to the public educational system.
All based off the ignorance of early european explorers breh. They saw brown skin and automatically thought African/ethiopianHubert Howe Bancroft and now Hernando de Soto both said that the American Indians were black. Yall only have excuses as to why we're not told that they said this in the public educational system....
Ah the typical, 'It's okay when I use it' argument.
You post pics of dark skinned amerindians with dreads: "See, they were black. Africans got to the Americas. Everybody's suppressing this knowledge. I don't trust establish science to the contrary."
When I post pics of dark skinned amerindians with dreads: "Man, fukk you lying ass N-word. Only my pics matter. Yada yada yada."
However I think I'm going to show the pic again:
Dark skinned Amerindians with dreads
They don't look like dreadlocks to me.
.
All based off the ignorance of early european explorers breh. They saw brown skin and automatically thought African/ethiopian
Ban Bet or STFU.
Google and YouTube won't help you against me.
They put colored people into a box and this holds credibility to youThey didnt say they were Ethiopian/African. They said they LOOKED like them. And they depicted them as looking as such.
The people your guys keep posting dont look African/Ethiopian
So much dishonesty. I don't know where to start.Yea you desperate
I posted something to you that, of course, you didnt address. Do the murals match the people you're posting moreso than black people?
Your argument is that the hair/skin color in this mural matches the pictures you're posting moreso than black people?
This is normal agent misdirection. Minimizing what I said by actually not addressing it. Not ONCE have I said anything about Africans. I said that there were so called "black" people in America before cacs. And I showed THEM (as in cacs that came here first) saying just that and you wont address that nor will you address why we are NOT educated on them saying these things. I learned about Hernando de Soto, Verrazzanno, and John Smith. Not ONCE was I told that they said the people they met in America were BLACK. You wont address this though... So lets try again. Tell me why them saying the Indians were black doesnt matter and also tell us why we're not educated on them telling us they were black....
You wont because you're an agent here to play misdirect
But earlier it was
Now the only pic you can post is one of locs and not one of the hairstyle you say it looks like
ultraflexed said:Actually there is direct proof of Africans traveling to south america regarding the great olmec statues which were directly from africa.
Isn't it ironic that white people have always said that all people of colour look alike. Yet now these dumb hoteps are perpetuating this awful stereotype!?They put colored people into a box and this holds credibility to you
Technically Olmec. However they are very much native Mesoamerican.No, that was disproved in 1997. Those are Mayan, not African.
iCarly fan said:That solves it.
The people depicted were "black" but not African.
Case closed.
Confirmed whiteVikings got here before Columbus. That’s an established fact. They didn't stay. I believe Melanesians probably got to South America prior to that based on genetic evidence.
Africans didn't get here until the 15th Century.