Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
They put colored people into a box and this holds credibility to you:dwillhuh:

Thats the best you can do? :heh:

Why arent they telling and educating people on how early Amerindians were depicted and described as being black?
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
Now if you wanna imply that Amerindians that first made it the Americas ~15000 years ago were black. Phenotypically - perhaps.

Ding Ding Ding! Thats all I said. The first Amercans were black. And I mean "black" by modern standards where even those melanasians you or someone else posted would come to America and be designated as black.

Your "genetically?" tidbit? Irrelevant because you cant prove genetics without putting full reliance on someone else to give you those answers.:coffee:

Here are things you didnt address. I have to put it in bullet points I guess to get you to have honest discourse:

-You said the murals didnt look like dreadlocks yet now you're posting pictures of Mongloids with dreadlocks. Which is it? Why cant you post pictures of mongloids with the hairstyle you say matches the murals?
-Are you saying the hair/skin color of the Mongloids matches the murals moreso than black people?
-You still havent told us as to why we're not educated on the comments of early authors/explorers saying/drawing/depicting the early indians as being black...

Like I said you're here to play misdirect. Thats why its "hotep" this and that every post yet you cant actually put forth arguments to what Im saying. I have to repeat things three posts in a row just to see you play misdirect around it.. Go ahead and come back and do it again
:sas1::sas2:
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
6,524
Reputation
703
Daps
16,329
Ding Ding Ding! Thats all I said. The first Amercans were black. And I mean "black" by modern standards where even those melanasians you or someone else posted would come to America and be designated as black.
You do realise that modern standards on how people look is changing, right?

Your "genetically?" tidbit? Irrelevant because you cant prove genetics without putting full reliance on someone else to give you those answers.:coffee:
This right here is the most anti-intellectual and dishonest thing I've seen on the coli. By your own logic you have to discard pretty much every intellectually endeavour. Even the mural that you posted to so call prove your point, you'd have to discard because you are in your own words 'putting full reliance on someone else to give you those answers.'

Here are things you didnt address. I have to put it in bullet points I guess to get you to have honest discourse:

-You said the murals didnt look like dreadlocks yet now you're posting pictures of Mongloids with dreadlocks. Which is it? Why cant you post pictures of mongloids with the hairstyle you say matches the murals?
-Are you saying the hair/skin color of the Mongloids matches the murals moreso than black people?
-You still havent told us as to why we're not educated on the comments of early authors/explorers saying/drawing/depicting the early indians as being black...

First point. I did post pics of amerindians with dreads.
Second point. I'm saying there have always been a vast range of phenotypes within amerindians since they got there.
Third point. Once again showing your logical fallacy. Back to the second paragraph that you wrote to respond to me. You're putting full reliance on someone else to give you the answers.

Like I said you're here to play misdirect. Thats why its "hotep" this and that every post yet you cant actually put forth arguments to what Im saying. I have to repeat things three posts in a row just to see you play misdirect around it.. Go ahead and come back and do it again
:sas1::sas2:
Projection at its finest.

Any more dishonesty, small timer.
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
You do realise that modern standards on how people look is changing, right?
Show how Black Americans look different now, then they did 200 years ago? :sas1:

This right here is the most anti-intellectual and dishonest thing I've seen on the coli. By your own logic you have to discard pretty much every intellectually endeavour. Even the mural that you posted to so call prove your point, you'd have to discard because you are in your own words 'putting full reliance on someone else to give you those answers.'

By my logic? By what logic can you prove ANYTHING about genetics when it comes to history? How do you know when a cac is hiding a black achievement/nation superpower behind fake genetics and when hes telling the truth?


3134263bee17971c48913420aa632655--am%C3%A9rica-latina-inca.jpg



These skin colors match the people in your pictures moreso than black people in America? :mjlol:

First point. I did post pics of amerindians with dreads.
Second point. I'm saying there have always been a vast range of phenotypes within amerindians since they got there.
Third point. Once again showing your logical fallacy. Back to the second paragraph that you wrote to respond to me. You're putting full reliance on someone else to give you the answers.

Three points and not one actually answered what I said. Its easy. Post a pic of who you say it matches, explain why we're not shown the "black" phenotypes that cacs say, and depicted, and ultimately the people themselves depicted themselves as. If you're not here to address whats being said and point in the right direction, then what else am I to think other you're an agent? Since you wont have any answers, heres anotherlack" American depiction too on your way out.....

0f01ab9e9739619ae277bd428675fbc9.jpg


:umad::camby:
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
6,524
Reputation
703
Daps
16,329
Show how Black Americans look different now, then they did 200 years ago? :sas1:



By my logic? By what logic can you prove ANYTHING about genetics when it comes to history? How do you know when a cac is hiding a black achievement/nation superpower behind fake genetics and when hes telling the truth?


3134263bee17971c48913420aa632655--am%C3%A9rica-latina-inca.jpg



These skin colors match the people in your pictures moreso than black people in America? :mjlol:



Three points and not one actually answered what I said. Its easy. Post a pic of who you say it matches, explain why we're not shown the "black" phenotypes that cacs say, and depicted, and ultimately the people themselves depicted themselves as. If you're not here to address whats being said and point in the right direction, then what else am I to think other you're an agent? Since you wont have any answers, heres anotherlack" American depiction too on your way out.....

0f01ab9e9739619ae277bd428675fbc9.jpg


:umad::camby:
Still writing more logical fallacies!?
That's all you've got. Dishonesty at its finest.

Let me guess your next reply to me:
More logical fallacies.
Post more pics to enhance your logical fallacies
Say i haven't answered the questions. Even though I had when I shouldn't really, as engaging logical fallacies is a waste of time.
Calling me an agent (the typical retort of a hotep fukktard)
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
Still writing more logical fallacies!?
That's all you've got. Dishonesty at its finest.

Let me guess your next reply to me:
More logical fallacies.
Post more pics to enhance your logical fallacies
Say i haven't answered the questions. Even though I had when I shouldn't really, as engaging logical fallacies is a waste of time.
Calling me an agent (the typical retort of a hotep fukktard)

"Post a pic that looks like the murals that you said had hair that did NOT look like locs" *Nothing* :dwillhuh:
"Address cacs suppressing black kingdoms and achievements" *Crickets* :gucci:
"Does the skin color/hair on the murals moreso match the skin color/hair of black people or the people in the pictures you posted?" *:what:*
"How can you prove when cacs are lying about ancient people using genetics to avoid giving a black kingdom credit and when they're telling the truth?" *:ld:*

Agents usually offer no answers/solutions. Just ridicule and misdirection. Keep showing your hand breh::francis::unimpressed:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,488
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Mhofu said:
Still writing more logical fallacies!?
That's all you've got. Dishonesty at its finest.

I told you, breh. Dude's entire argument is hypocrisy at it's finest and boils-down to:​

You can't trust ANYTHING White people say......except for THIS stuff White people say.

:francis:
 

Mindfield333

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
16,548
Reputation
1,808
Daps
47,618
Reppin
NC
I have yet to see actual compelling evidence coming from the "they came before columbus" crowd

And the logic funding it has been :patrice::snoop: so far

Very dangerous to spread misinformation of this sort
The misinformation started when I was forced to learn in elementary that Columbus discovered America. From then on I saw history as collusion from people who wanted to look more important in the timeline of history than they really were :mjpls:. Folks think The Christ was a white dude with long hair... and y’all still believe things they write
 

cornercommission2k12

so this were u dudes went
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
24,181
Reputation
5,904
Daps
74,828
Reppin
300 murders a year
Wow some of y’all really think that other groups of people advanced faster than the original man
:ohhh:
Taking dangerous life threatening voyages across a very dangerous ocean that resulted in thousands of white people dying is not advancement it was desperation due to parts of europe becoming depleted of resources and sickness. They were not "exploring" for the sake of scientific advancement they were "invading " to find resources to trade for the sake of survival.

Africans didnt have this issue because we had many things to trade with outsiders and was cool in the land we were at for the most part. Its more intelligent to remain where it's safe rather than travel and nature destroy you.
 

BmoreGorilla

Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
38,661
Reputation
29,757
Daps
250,722
Reppin
Man, woman, and child
Taking dangerous life threatening voyages across a very dangerous ocean that resulted in thousands of white people dying is not advancement it was desperation due to parts of europe becoming depleted of resources and sickness. They were not "exploring" for the sake of scientific advancement they were "invading " to find resources to trade for the sake of survival.

Africans didnt have this issue because we had many things to trade with outsiders and was cool in the land we were at for the most part. Its more intelligent to remain where it's safe rather than travel and nature destroy you.
Being able to travel across oceans is definitely advancement. I’ve read on here how all these other groups did it before Africans which doesnt make sense. Even if they had no reason to leave doesn’t mean they didnt wanna see what was out there
 

Dion Isus

Pro
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
347
Reputation
-210
Daps
793
Being able to travel across oceans is definitely advancement. I’ve read on here how all these other groups did it before Africans which doesnt make sense. Even if they had no reason to leave doesn’t mean they didnt wanna see what was out there

Where is the hard evidence that Africans had ocean crossing technology? I wouldn't be surprised if East Africans had it, but West Africans did not.
 
Top