Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
They put colored people into a box and this holds credibility to you
Thats the best you can do?
Why arent they telling and educating people on how early Amerindians were depicted and described as being black?
They put colored people into a box and this holds credibility to you
Now if you wanna imply that Amerindians that first made it the Americas ~15000 years ago were black. Phenotypically - perhaps.
You do realise that modern standards on how people look is changing, right?Ding Ding Ding! Thats all I said. The first Amercans were black. And I mean "black" by modern standards where even those melanasians you or someone else posted would come to America and be designated as black.
This right here is the most anti-intellectual and dishonest thing I've seen on the coli. By your own logic you have to discard pretty much every intellectually endeavour. Even the mural that you posted to so call prove your point, you'd have to discard because you are in your own words 'putting full reliance on someone else to give you those answers.'Your "genetically?" tidbit? Irrelevant because you cant prove genetics without putting full reliance on someone else to give you those answers.
Here are things you didnt address. I have to put it in bullet points I guess to get you to have honest discourse:
-You said the murals didnt look like dreadlocks yet now you're posting pictures of Mongloids with dreadlocks. Which is it? Why cant you post pictures of mongloids with the hairstyle you say matches the murals?
-Are you saying the hair/skin color of the Mongloids matches the murals moreso than black people?
-You still havent told us as to why we're not educated on the comments of early authors/explorers saying/drawing/depicting the early indians as being black...
Projection at its finest.Like I said you're here to play misdirect. Thats why its "hotep" this and that every post yet you cant actually put forth arguments to what Im saying. I have to repeat things three posts in a row just to see you play misdirect around it.. Go ahead and come back and do it again
Show how Black Americans look different now, then they did 200 years ago?You do realise that modern standards on how people look is changing, right?
This right here is the most anti-intellectual and dishonest thing I've seen on the coli. By your own logic you have to discard pretty much every intellectually endeavour. Even the mural that you posted to so call prove your point, you'd have to discard because you are in your own words 'putting full reliance on someone else to give you those answers.'
First point. I did post pics of amerindians with dreads.
Second point. I'm saying there have always been a vast range of phenotypes within amerindians since they got there.
Third point. Once again showing your logical fallacy. Back to the second paragraph that you wrote to respond to me. You're putting full reliance on someone else to give you the answers.
Still writing more logical fallacies!?Show how Black Americans look different now, then they did 200 years ago?
By my logic? By what logic can you prove ANYTHING about genetics when it comes to history? How do you know when a cac is hiding a black achievement/nation superpower behind fake genetics and when hes telling the truth?
These skin colors match the people in your pictures moreso than black people in America?
Three points and not one actually answered what I said. Its easy. Post a pic of who you say it matches, explain why we're not shown the "black" phenotypes that cacs say, and depicted, and ultimately the people themselves depicted themselves as. If you're not here to address whats being said and point in the right direction, then what else am I to think other you're an agent? Since you wont have any answers, heres anotherlack" American depiction too on your way out.....
Still writing more logical fallacies!?
That's all you've got. Dishonesty at its finest.
Let me guess your next reply to me:
More logical fallacies.
Post more pics to enhance your logical fallacies
Say i haven't answered the questions. Even though I had when I shouldn't really, as engaging logical fallacies is a waste of time.
Calling me an agent (the typical retort of a hotep fukktard)
Mhofu said:Still writing more logical fallacies!?
That's all you've got. Dishonesty at its finest.
Gotta see what kind of person this isFrom the PEER-REVIEWED article I linked earlier.....
Mindfield333 said:Gotta see what kind of person this is
The misinformation started when I was forced to learn in elementary that Columbus discovered America. From then on I saw history as collusion from people who wanted to look more important in the timeline of history than they really were . Folks think The Christ was a white dude with long hair... and y’all still believe things they writeI have yet to see actual compelling evidence coming from the "they came before columbus" crowd
And the logic funding it has been so far
Very dangerous to spread misinformation of this sort
Taking dangerous life threatening voyages across a very dangerous ocean that resulted in thousands of white people dying is not advancement it was desperation due to parts of europe becoming depleted of resources and sickness. They were not "exploring" for the sake of scientific advancement they were "invading " to find resources to trade for the sake of survival.Wow some of y’all really think that other groups of people advanced faster than the original man
Being able to travel across oceans is definitely advancement. I’ve read on here how all these other groups did it before Africans which doesnt make sense. Even if they had no reason to leave doesn’t mean they didnt wanna see what was out thereTaking dangerous life threatening voyages across a very dangerous ocean that resulted in thousands of white people dying is not advancement it was desperation due to parts of europe becoming depleted of resources and sickness. They were not "exploring" for the sake of scientific advancement they were "invading " to find resources to trade for the sake of survival.
Africans didnt have this issue because we had many things to trade with outsiders and was cool in the land we were at for the most part. Its more intelligent to remain where it's safe rather than travel and nature destroy you.
Being able to travel across oceans is definitely advancement. I’ve read on here how all these other groups did it before Africans which doesnt make sense. Even if they had no reason to leave doesn’t mean they didnt wanna see what was out there
All based off the ignorance of early european explorers breh. They saw brown skin and automatically thought African/ethiopian