Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
Translation - Facts and evidence doesn't matter to you. Just muh feels.
The Yank education system in action.

:russell:

Yank education doesnt make mention of any group of dark skinned people with loc'd hair being in America before yanks. Just as Euro education doesnt mention black moors ruling Europe before modern Euros. Its called suppression.

What does my nationality have to do with you denying established facts? You have offered no counter argument apart from a mural.
Because you not being American means you would have no understanding of NOT being taught about ANY indigenous Americans being dark skinned with those type of locs as their hairstyle. . So if you want to pretend that the skin color in the mural isnt the or close to the skin color of "black" people and also pretend that "black" people dont wear their hair just as the people in the murals do then thats on you. Reality is that its proof that there were black people here before cacs
If you want to pretend that archaeology, genetics, linguistics and many other fields of study are irrelevant, that's fine. However most if you want to convince the rest of world of your assertion then you're going to need more than a mural. I know that might pass for proof in the Yank education system but not for the rest of the world.

You just rambling. Stop repeating yourself and address whats being said directly. In American education system we're not taught about the differing Amerindians that were out there some of which had afro like hair. At no time was I told of any Amerindian that resembled "negroes" like Hubert Howe Bancroft wrote:

"THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS IN GENERAL ARE OF A MIDDLING OR RATHER OF A LOW STATURE A DARK BROWN COLOR APPROACHING TO BLACK MATTED BUSHY HAIR LARGE PROJECTING LIPS AND BROAD FLAT NEGRO-LIKE NOSES THEY BEAR A STRONG RESEMBLANCE TO THE NEGROES-THE NATIVE RACES OF THE PACIFIC STATES OF NORTH AMERICA 1874

And nah you got me fukked up sis. I dont care to convince you of anything who isnt an American black. Your opinion on us or who we come from is irrelevant because you're not one of us. So its not about convincing you of anything but laying out the information out there for those it applies to so they can go and look for themselves...
:yeshrug:
 

Supper

All Star
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
2,920
Reputation
2,855
Daps
12,344
What group of people would you say was walking around Mexico with dreadlocks? :jbhmm:

hbiwhdojhkj21.jpg


:mjlol::umad:

Amerindian people with natural dreadlocks don't exist you say?

44215fa0248be19d4b3246875416452e.jpg


1fbec66d0a0e8d2ff5301707ecf456fc.jpg


220px-NativeAmericanLockedHair.jpg


Since you like playing pictionary.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
294
Reputation
-330
Daps
346
Reppin
Green
"One of the oldest and most important archaeologists in America, Dr. Clarence Weiant, who was on the site in Mexico when the first stone heads (some with African features) were discovered, defends Van Sertima against attempts by the British archaeological establishment to discredit his earlier book, “They Came Before Columbus”.

“Van Sertima's work,” Dr. Weiant writes, “is a summary of six or seven years of meticulous research based upon archaeology, egyptology, African history, oceanography, astronomy, botany, rare Arabic and Chinese manuscripts, the letters and journals of early American explorers, and the observations of physical anthropologists...As one who has been immersed in Mexican archaeology for some forty years, and who participated in the excavation of the first giant heads, I must confess, I am thoroughly convinced of the soundness of Van Sertima’s conclusions.”

—Dr. Clarence Weiant
Letter to the New York Times, May 1, 1977
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
You're the one that made the assertion. Now prove it.

Now goofy wants to play duck duck goose with the fact that history doesn’t teach us about the moors, dark skinned Amerindians with locs, or cac authors saying certain Indians resembled negroes.
:russ:

Just like the cacs who you go to to learn history, you run away from it. Typical
:ehh::yeshrug:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
Those are not the same people as the folks in the Bonampak murals though.

If you’re saying the people at the bottom of the mural are not the same as the ones at the top then that isn’t relevant. Fact of the matter Is that it puts a people that strongly resembles black people in America BEFORE they should have been here...

And these clowns been ducking it ever since I first brought it up
 
Top