10 dead & 3 wounded in MASS SHOOTING in Buffalo, NY /racist targeted Blacks/* DOJ seeks the Death penalty

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,614
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,556
Reppin
the ether
This.

Ive noticed Ppl buy a gun and they somehow get to thinking they John Wick or some shyt. "Oh if that was me I woulda done this that and the third", no you wouldnt. For most people Owning a gun is pretty much just peace of mind and a way to feel tough. Its incredibly rare that youll be in a position to randomly thwart a robbery or stop a public mass shooting Just because youve purchased a gun. If a psycho killer has the drop on you then that's that. Youre not going to see it coming and thats the sad truth... Which is why Literally ANY properly functioning sovereignty would have said fukk this and scrapped guns, or atleast made them very very difficult to acquire. its the obvious solution.

Its one thing to keep a pistol at the crib especially if you live in the middle of nowhere miles and miles away from any police station.
Its one thing if youre in a potentially dangerous line of work and you need protection from potential attacks

Other than that, everyone walking around in public with a gun like some cowboy in 2022 is the most pointless, retarded thing imaginable and only causes more problems. proper Regulations is the only thing that will make this shyt happen less.


All of this is 100% true but they don't want to hear it.

A trained, experienced cop on the scene had his gun out firing at the gunman, on target, and still got clapped. Didn't even slow him down.

But they think that with zero experience and having never once been in a shootout before, they're gonna pull their .38 and take out a guy who is unloading with an AK-47 and wearing body armor. Even though he started firing before they even remembered which pocket their gun was in.


There's a reason why less than 1 in 100 mass shootings are stopped by armed bystanders, even though we live in the most gun-happy nation on Earth.





i dont know why people think everybody having a gun the answer. I think all the places with low gun death and violence have bans on guns. Everybody being strapped means shootouts and regular people train to shoot at targets, they dont train to be shot at. A bunch of innocent people getting shot in the crossfire is where we are going. :francis:


Because they don't rely on facts for their argument, they rely on TV gunfights and political propaganda.

Countries with gun control have lower gun deaths on average.

States with gun control have lower gun deaths on average.

Cities in states with gun control have lower gun deaths on average than cities in states without gun control.

Households with guns in them are more likely to suffer a homicide or suicide death than households without guns.

Mugging victims who are armed are more likely to get shot than unarmed mugging victims.


ALL of that is well-proven in study after study. NRA has to pay a couple absolute clown researchers to have any pro-gun evidence at all, otherwise the evidence is dominant on the other side. I don't know why they wish so bad to ignore reality.
 
Last edited:

skylove4

Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
18,073
Reputation
4,639
Daps
87,456
I just watched this horrible video smh. If any person can watch this shyt and still think assault weapons should be legal, they need to be put on a watch list. There is nothing these folks could have done even if all of them had guns, it was that fast.We need to move this nation to the left asap for sensible gun control.I know some of you cats think you’re Rambo in this thread with your guns,but just imagine you’re with your children, your old lady anywhere and something like this pops off, now imagine they’re multiple shooters and your family is catching bullets from these guns, there would be nothing you could do . All Americans who aren’t fukked in the head should be in support of a ban.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,614
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,556
Reppin
the ether
If those ppl had guns on them, the gun man would have fled

There was an armed security guard there, former cop. He pulled and shot. Shooter just ate the bullets with his body armor and shot him down with his MUCH more powerful gun.

Y'all repeat right-wing narratives of how this shyt goes down and ignore reality. Not even 1 in 100 mass shootings are stopped by an armed bystander, because the armed bystanders are outgunned, have a far more difficult task, and the shooter always has the advantage of surprise.




They always choose places where people are less likely to be carrying.

This is complete cap. They did a study of hundreds of mass shootings and they couldn't find a single one where the presence or lack of guns played the slightest role in the shooter's choice of place to carry out the act. Even when they had dozens or hundreds of pages of material from the shooter where they had been plotting and working out their attack, not a single word around looking for a locality with fewer guns present.

You're literally just repeating NRA propaganda.



Was the security guard the only one with a gun?

If everything in his vision would have had a gun, how do you think things would have played out?

How would that even work? He starts firing with his AK-47, and a bunch of random civilians who have never been in an shootout before ignore the bullets to pull on him? What, they all start shooting from different directions and ignore the crossfire? Just shooting unconscious without concern for hitting someone else in the crowd or taking cover? Even though most of them (just like most crowds) are either women, children, or elderly - do they all have guns too?

He had an assault rifle. He was wearing body armor. He ate bullets from the ex-cop and shot him down without a worry. If more people had pulled, he just would have sprayed, cause he had the bigger gun and he had it out first.

You're talking like people haven't pulled mass shootings on cops before.
 

Kaypain

#SuicideGang
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
34,760
Reputation
8,906
Daps
92,447
There was an armed security guard there, former cop. He pulled and shot. Shooter just ate the bullets with his body armor and shot him down with his MUCH more powerful gun.

Y'all repeat right-wing narratives of how this shyt goes down and ignore reality. Not even 1 in 100 mass shootings are stopped by an armed bystander, because the armed bystanders are outgunned, have a far more difficult task, and the shooter always has the advantage of surprise.






This is complete cap. They did a study of hundreds of mass shootings and they couldn't find a single one where the presence or lack of guns played the slightest role in the shooter's choice of place to carry out the act. Even when they had dozens or hundreds of pages of material from the shooter where they had been plotting and working out their attack, not a single word around looking for a locality with fewer guns present.

You're literally just repeating NRA propaganda.





How would that even work? He starts firing with his AK-47, and a bunch of random civilians who have never been in an shootout before ignore the bullets to pull on him? What, they all start shooting from different directions and ignore the crossfire? Just shooting unconscious without concern for hitting someone else in the crowd or taking cover? Even though most of them (just like most crowds) are either women, children, or elderly - do they all have guns too?

He had an assault rifle. He was wearing body armor. He ate bullets from the ex-cop and shot him down without a worry. If more people had pulled, he just would have sprayed, cause he had the bigger gun and he had it out first.

You're talking like people haven't pulled mass shootings on cops before.
I don't give a fukk what the study says nikka and I don't give a fukk about no NRA either.

I said what I said
 

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
21,641
Reputation
4,074
Daps
55,466
Reppin
These Internet Streetz
to the good guys with a gun, if you werent carrying an FN5.7, you were just going to end up like that security guard. that dude had no fear of suppressive fire from normal pistol rounds. maybe from this day on, more security will carry that. the north hollywood shootout put rifles in all squad cars after it happened.
 

Will Ross

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,714
Reputation
-6,063
Daps
59,330
There was an armed security guard there, former cop. He pulled and shot. Shooter just ate the bullets with his body armor and shot him down with his MUCH more powerful gun.

Y'all repeat right-wing narratives of how this shyt goes down and ignore reality. Not even 1 in 100 mass shootings are stopped by an armed bystander, because the armed bystanders are outgunned, have a far more difficult task, and the shooter always has the advantage of surprise.






This is complete cap. They did a study of hundreds of mass shootings and they couldn't find a single one where the presence or lack of guns played the slightest role in the shooter's choice of place to carry out the act. Even when they had dozens or hundreds of pages of material from the shooter where they had been plotting and working out their attack, not a single word around looking for a locality with fewer guns present.

You're literally just repeating NRA propaganda.





How would that even work? He starts firing with his AK-47, and a bunch of random civilians who have never been in an shootout before ignore the bullets to pull on him? What, they all start shooting from different directions and ignore the crossfire? Just shooting unconscious without concern for hitting someone else in the crowd or taking cover? Even though most of them (just like most crowds) are either women, children, or elderly - do they all have guns too?

He had an assault rifle. He was wearing body armor. He ate bullets from the ex-cop and shot him down without a worry. If more people had pulled, he just would have sprayed, cause he had the bigger gun and he had it out first.

You're talking like people haven't pulled mass shootings on cops before.


He picked the place he did because it would be a soft target.
Do you really think guns should be hard to get when right-wing people are allowed to have them.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
33,043
Reputation
2,003
Daps
161,636
Why does this dude Rhakim insist on painting Micah Johnson as a “mass shooter,” likening him to cacs who massacred defenseless innocent civilians? Context matters, you bootlicking fakkit.

The bulk of your contributions to this thread consists of condescending lectures on shyt that has zero relevance to this incident.

:scust:
 
Top