I see people arguing about what I perceive to be the wrong thing in this BTC / ETH debate
BTC’s use case was a digital currency, it’s use case turned into store-of-value.
All other things like it’s original idea of being a currency and smart-contracts being out there etc aren’t important, when it’s store of value is accepted as such.
ETH’s usecase is in the smart-contracts.
Yes, it has it’s flaws PoW etc, but those are not important when their platform is ACCEPTED as the go-to right now, flaws and all.
Being a Maxi when it comes to these coins makes no sense to me, they both have their purpose.
That being said.
Time will tell which companies will stand the test of time.
There will not be 1 winner, just like how Samsung exists while Apple exists.
To me, ALGO will be a longterm winner. Not because they’re tryna be ETH, but because they completely understand the FUNCTION of finance and crypto’s position in that space. They analyzed it and created a unique TECHNOLOGY with a tactic that tackles the purpose of finance. Their plan and approach is way bigger than a quick buck which will reveal itself over time. That’s why they’re not concerned with being popular while they’re rubbing shoulders with the likes of OMFIF. DYOR, I’ll leave it at that.
To those specifically interested in the concept of limited supply that makes BTC so popular, look no further than YFI.
A max supply of 36.666, I see it as the rich man’s BTC in this run.
An important question to ask yourself, are you a trader or an investor.
Know the difference. Both can make money,
just in different ways imo. Both tactics aren’t mutually exclusive in an individual either.
I’ll let y’all figure the rest out on y’all own.
DYOR and move accordingly.