are you advocating robot people?That's the root of the problem.
that's...daring
are you a robot?
are you advocating robot people?That's the root of the problem.
No, just a constrained govt. resulting in a constrained potential to do harm.are you advocating robot people?
that's...daring
are you a robot?
No, just a constrained govt. resulting in a constrained potential to do harm.
How exactly is the corporatism being peddled by Democrats and Republicans worse for corporations though? you still haven't explained
I'm not gonna comment until I read the whole thing
A constrained govt. means less bureaucracy and in theory more money reaching its intended destination.Throw money at a problem without coming up with a solution or legitimate administration to solve it brehs
Throw money at a problem without coming up with a solution or legitimate administration to solve it brehs
How did bureaucracy keep this money from getting to its proper destination?A constrained govt. means less bureaucracy and in theory more money reaching its intended destination.
One could go even further and entertain the removal of govt's monopoly on education.
That isn't true at all, the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service is not exclusive to for profit entities...How did bureaucracy keep this money from getting to its proper destination?
And monopolies only apply to for profit entities. Education is supposed to be a profitless endeavor that exists for the public good. If there was money in education Wall St and the private industry would have lobbied for their own monopoly on it.
Leave it to a right wing capitalist to mistake education to be a commodity/service.That isn't true at all, the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service is not exclusive to for profit entities...
But to answer you, the money passed through too many hands. Simple as that.
Each hand kept a little for itself, and by the time it reached the floor, you were looking at pennies. The larger the bureaucracy the more hands ... you get the idea.
he should have given the money directly to the schools themselves, where corruption would be easier to spot... but i'm sure the state has set up some barrier to such result orientated endeavors.
Would it solve the problem? no, but it would do a lot to improve the performance of our education system across the board.