Zelina Vega released!!

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,808
Reputation
13,855
Daps
264,194
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Treating someone like an independent contractor and telling them to act like an employee isn't arguing semantics :mjlol:. As for your question about the movie set spoilers did the independent contractor sign some sort of nda? If they didn't the movie company has no legal grounds. I have no doubt a lawyer for a billion dollar company knows more about finessing legally. Same as these prosecutors know how to finesse cops out of murdering motherfukkers. Your arguments weak as fukk lmao.
lol...of course, there would be an NDA...you can put shyt in the contracts...THAT'S WHY YOU READ THE CONTRACTS BEFORE YOU SIGN THEM. this is what yall don't understand. yall think only wwe in bound by the contract not the wrestlers. And I noticed yall skipped over the AJ example...and what i'm specifically talking about with Twitch. This isn't them just talkin about shyt on the side...they making money behind this information based directly on their status as a WWE employee. And you think WWE is not eventually going to do something about that? Talking about a weak argument...there's a reason why she had no legs to stand on here legally. Common sense.

So again, let's use similar examples...lets say somebody gets contracted to cater an MCU film and it's in the contract that you have to have consent to discuss certain things that you see on set...do you think they can jump on a twitch stream dropping spoilers of what they saw on set and then claim "i'ma contractor...not an employee...yall don't own what i can say"...how would that look? LMAO
 
Last edited:

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,808
Reputation
13,855
Daps
264,194
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Someone please show me receipts where they’re dropping spoilers on their Twitch streams etc..
that's just an example to prove a point. And i already posted that clip of AJ Styles talking about behind the scenes shyt directly related to WWE. That's an easy win for a lawyer for WWE. AJ on a monetized platform talking about WWE without consent, you think WWE can't legally make a claim to at least a percentage of that while he's currently employed there? Stop thinking like a neckbeard and think from a business and "contractor" stance. :what:
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,808
Reputation
13,855
Daps
264,194
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Actual independent contractors have way more leverage , lol yes a movie can say that they couldn't post spoilers but they couldn't dictate what platforms you use , you are being disingenuous , we all know that they just label them independent contractors to not pay benefits, corporations find loopholes to do questionable shyt all the time , lol at this bbuuut but their legal team said
LOL you nikkas think you know more than a legal team for a billion dollar company. If you're neckbeard conspiracies were true the entire landscape of WWE would be different. It would be night and day if all of these contractor myths were true. LMAO nikka said loopholes.
 

NoMorePie

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
61,131
Reputation
11,598
Daps
218,149
It would take a top star to stand up. But the only top star who has twitch is aj styles, but he already stopped streaming. He bowed down to the man :coffee:

Maybe Xavier woods but his streaming platform is partnered with wwe so I doubt he would risk his platform for this shyt
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,935
Reputation
12,618
Daps
138,042
Reppin
Staff
The only argument Vince has is that their streaming audience was built upon the foundation of their WWE career so he should get something. I mean, fair enough. So why doesn't he just take a small percentage instead of shutting everything down? However you look at it he's being a bytch about it. You'd think he'd be pushing for MORE fan interaction. Dude is fried.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,933
Daps
120,887
Reppin
Behind You
Put it this way. If YOU ran a wrestling company and the people signed to your company jumped on a twitch stream every night talking about how you run shyt and making money from that stream are you going to just be cool or asking for your cut. Its people talking about your company's inner working making money from that. Have some of yall thought this through?
Unless there is something in those contracts saying what they can or cannot talk about what goes on with WWE and if they do they will be fined, then I really don't see how this idea that Vince deserves a cut of people's non-WWE gigs makes any sense.
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,808
Reputation
13,855
Daps
264,194
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
You gotta love when they start throwing around the neck beard label, while acting like neck beards defending a company that isn’t even paying them to do so.
because like i keep saying, some of you are only looking at it from a wrestling fan perspective with "fukk Vince" as the context.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
123,490
Reputation
8,538
Daps
146,031
Reppin
Westcoast
LOL you nikkas think you know more than a legal team for a billion dollar company. If you're neckbeard conspiracies were true the entire landscape of WWE would be different. It would be night and day if all of these contractor myths were true. LMAO nikka said loopholes.
The billion dollar company lawyers are there to find wiggle room. Thats why he clamps down on trademarks and all of that.
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,808
Reputation
13,855
Daps
264,194
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Unless there is something in those contracts saying what they can or cannot talk about what goes on with WWE and if they do they will be fined, then I really don't see how this idea that Vince deserves a cut of people's non-WWE gigs makes any sense.
I already gave you an example...AJ Styles was discussing WWE behind-the-scenes shyt on his Twitch stream that's most likely monetized. He was using his status as an active WWE contractor to make side money. That's an easy thing for WWE to lay claim to.

Also, when WWE is using their resources to help someone like Velveteen Dream navigate those accusations on social media, do you think WWE deserves a cut or a little more control? Because when he was going through that shyt on 3rd party stuff, people here were acting like WWE was directly responsible. Now people are saying WWE has no connection to wrestler's social media activities. There's a flip flopping going on.
 

jackswstd

Retired
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,976
Reputation
8,917
Daps
265,104
Reppin
Chicago
She was never a fit there & it's not like wwe invested much in her besides looking pretty.

No real loss were made on either side :yeshrug:
She helped get Andrade over, before they put her with him dude was walking out there dressed like a male stripper. Her mic skills were necessary.
 
Top