Coli militancy is seriously business. fukk a good deed if it's at the hand of a rich cac.
Man I'm telling you it's always something
Coli militancy is seriously business. fukk a good deed if it's at the hand of a rich cac.
seeing someone get shytted on for CHARITY has to be the most TLR thing I've ever seen
Like if you ain’t super rich then you have no idea what a rich person should be doing.
If you ain’t giving to all of these charities and causes then you have no right to be saying what’s a good charity or a bad one.
If it was a black woman who started the same exact channel at 14 and was now 24 doing the same as mr beast, i would have posted the same post. As a 24 year old, he has showed that he's about doing positive things as well. He's just not doing it in a way you approve.
I did watch the vid. I thought it was interesting. What i got from the video is that philanthropy is a big game for corps. As far as how it relates to mrbeast (cause his name was kinda used to hook people in but the doc wasn't really about mrbeast), even the vid you reference sorta implies MrBeast's heart is probably in the right place so i would ask did you watch it? Are we sure that HE watched it? Maybe Mrbeast is not aware of how all this shyt breaks down. I mean, I'm in my mid 30s and a lot of the stuff they talked about in the video i wasn't aware of. That's why i don't assume other people automatically have complete knowledge on certain subjects even if they are involved in it.
So are you mad at Mr Beast or the fact that we live in a capitalistic society that creates a "need" for a Mr. Beast?
This is some of the most bootlooking shyt I've ever read. You literally said rich people are beyond criticism.
How the fukk you can claim that only rich people can tell the difference between a good charity and a bad charity? I actually work in the sector and have been doing so for over a decade, I think I know slight more about good charities and bad charities than a blatant corporate tool like Mr. Beast. Even before I started working in the nonprofit sector myself, I did more due dilligence giving away hundreds of dollars when I was in college than Mr. Beast is "giving" away thousands of dollars (most of the time, not even giving it away but just making videos hyping corporate giveaways for his own clout).
Did you watch the video or not? Is this guy qualified to critique the system Mr. Beast promotes, or no?
Exactly, no one gives a fukk about Mr. Beast just making 1000 people see who couldn't is a good thing to do and no book or academic writings is going to convince me it's bad. People don't care about the rest. This type of behavior should be encouraged not shyt on and if you are shytting on it you need to get introspective on why. You lost the plot.My point is y’all are never happy, y’all always point out the negative. I don’t give AF about this dude or his channel, all I’m saying is he is using his platform to give away the money he’s making.
You can’t possibly convince me that these people that he helped gives a shyt about any of the talking points in here. I can admit that I can’t prove my point about which charity is the best or what rich people should be doing but ultimately if you are not rich then don’t tell me what rich people should be doing.
Also in this case It’s not that deep, this dude tries to help people for whatever reason, and all you do is try to find something wrong with it. If I was blind and I could now see due to his “clout chasing” exploits” or whatever reason you think he did it for, I would not care one bit. At the end of the day he helped 100 or so people that he didn’t have to.
This ain’t the hill to die on
My point is y’all are never happy, y’all always point out the negative. I don’t give AF about this dude or his channel, all I’m saying is he is using his platform to give away the money he’s making.
You can’t possibly convince me that these people that he helped gives a shyt about any of the talking points in here.
I can admit that I can’t prove my point about which charity is the best or what rich people should be doing but ultimately if you are not rich then don’t tell me what rich people should be doing.
Crazy how people who have never donated a cent or an hour to help anyone else feel so compelled to tell others how to spend their own money.
You got no proof this internet youtuber is "fukking over a billion people". If the companies that gave him the money are be mad at them not the guy who used their money for good.But that's not what he's doing, if you paid any attention. He isn't using his platform to give away the money he makes, he's using the guise of charity to make money which comes directly from corporate sponsors. Most if not all of the money going out in these made-for-internet show pieces ain't even his own money, they're
So if you help a thousand people in the process of fukking over a billion people, we can't criticize what you did to the billion people, because you helped a thousand?
Again, how is that different from supporting the show-charity that billionaires like Trump or dictators like Putin use in order to further their agenda for power? How is it different from the EXACT shyt shown in the video, where exploitative corporations pay Mr. Beast to whitewash them on their channel, so they can keep fukking over everyone for billions in profits because they made themselves look good online?
The degree of bootlicking here is fukking insane. @EndDomination @mastermind, we have the final boss bootlicker.
"It's okay for someone who knows nothing about charity to lecture a professional in the field about it. But it's wrong for a professional in the field to ever criticize a rich person, because rich people are above our puny criticisms."
You got no proof this internet youtuber is "fukking over a billion people".
If the companies that gave him the money are be mad at them not the guy who used their money for good.
And no one here is watching his channel and saying, "Hey corporation X is good because they gave Mr. BEAST money." You are jumping to shyt no one is saying in here.
Why do you think I care about this man’s money. I am only commenting because you dudes are always trying to point out what’s wrong with any and everything a famous or semi famous person does.But that's not what he's doing, if you paid any attention. He isn't using his platform to give away the money he makes, he's using the guise of charity to make money which comes directly from corporate sponsors. He's profitting off a show of charity. Most if not all of the money going out in these made-for-internet show pieces ain't even his own money, the funds come from corporate sponsors and in the end they make a lot more money for the corporate sponsors, of which he is just taking part of the cut.
So if you help a thousand people in the process of fukking over a billion people, we can't criticize what you did to the billion people, because you helped a thousand?
Again, how is that different from supporting the show-charity that billionaires like Trump or dictators like Putin use in order to further their agenda for power? How is it different from the EXACT shyt shown in the video, where exploitative corporations pay Mr. Beast to whitewash them on their channel, so they can keep fukking over everyone for billions in profits because they made themselves look good online?
Did you watch the video on how his channel is used to whitewash corporate evil or not?
The degree of bootlicking here is fukking insane. @EndDomination @mastermind, we have the final boss bootlicker.
"It's okay for someone who knows nothing about charity to lecture a professional in the field about it. But it's wrong for a professional in the field to ever criticize a rich person, because rich people are above our puny criticisms."